Will America allow the Jews-Only State in Palestine to Develop Long Range Weapons of Mass Destruction that Threaten America?
Updated February 4th 2006.
It is believed the jews-only state in palestine developed its first nuclear weapon in the 1960s. "There is little doubt that some time in the late sixties Israel became the sixth nation to manufacture nuclear weapons. ." (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003).
Since then it has amassed an arsenal that has been variously estimated at between 200-400 nuclear weapons. Some commentators have argued this makes it the world’s fourth most powerful nation in the world – although many jews, still trying to preserve the image of a defenceless, jewish state surrounded by an ocean of heavily armed, arab/moslem states, denounce such an estimate as anti-semitic. "A former Pentagon official and whistle-blower, Daniel Ellsberg, said this week that Israel could have close to 400 nuclear weapons. "That’s more than Britain, China, India and Pakistan, and probably more than France," said Ellsberg speaking at a news conference in New York on Thursday." (Israel May Have 400 Atomic Weapons, says Pentagon Whistle Blower’ http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level.php?cat=Security&loid=8.0.166437780&par=0 May 13th 2005). However, it is not known what proportion of these nuclear weapons are battlefield, regional, or intercontinental, weapons.
Since the early 1970s the neocons in american politics, overwhelmingly jews whose sole loyalty is to the jews-only state in palestine, have operated on the convenient, but highly dubious, assumption that what is good for the jews-only state in palestine is good for america. This assumption ignores a critical issue: whether america is wise to continue providing economic assistance, military hardware, and technological assistance, to the jews-only state, as it has done since 1967, so that it can develop intercontinental nuclear missiles that could threaten the united states? Of course, zionists would argue, it is highly unlikely the jews-only state would ever want to threaten its bountiful provider but why should americans put themselves at risk?
The long term goals of the jews-only state in palestine are firstly, to gain political and military independence from all other countries. Secondly, to protect not only the jews within its borders but all jews around the world, "Unlike many countries, including the United States, the Israeli state does not belong, even in principle, to those who reside within its borders, but is defined as the state of the Jewish people, wherever they may be." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’ counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004). Zionists are determined to acquire the capability for destroying any country which attempts another mass slaughter of its jewish population. This means nuclear missiles that can reach any country around the world. Thirdly, to increase the territory of the jews-only state to make it more difficult for it to be obliterated with nuclear weapons. The tiny size of the jews-only state leaves it highly vulnerable to obliteration in a nuclear attack. The jews-only state, however, has a long way to go before achieving these objectives.
As regards the first objective, the jews-only state still has a significant technological, military, and economic, reliance on america. Although the jews-only state can protect jews within its borders it is currently unable to protect all jews around the world, especially the huge numbers of jews living in america. According to warner d. farr, the zionists are as good technically at developing nuclear weapons as the americans or the russians, "Mordechai Vanunu provided the best look at the Israeli nuclear arsenal in 1985 complete with photographs. A technician from Dimona who lost his job, Vanunu secretly took photographs, immigrated to Australia and published some of his material in the London Sunday Times. He was subsequently kidnapped by Israeli agents, tried and imprisoned. His data shows a sophisticated nuclear program, over 200 bombs, with boosted devices, neutron bombs, F-16 deliverable warheads, and Jericho warheads. The boosted weapons shown in the Vanunu photographs show a sophistication that inferred the requirement for testing. He revealed for the first time the underground plutonium separation facility where Israel was producing 40 kilograms annually, several times more than previous estimates. Photographs showed sophisticated designs which scientific experts say enabled the Israelis to build bombs with as little as 4 kilograms of plutonium. These facts have increased the estimates of total Israeli nuclear stockpiles. In the words of one American, "[the Israelis] can do anything we or the Soviets can do."" (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003).
As regards the second objective, the jews-only state has probably developed medium range nuclear missiles which can reach any country in the middle east. It has also developed long range nuclear missiles which could pose a retaliatory threat to russia, europe, and china. But whether it has developed nuclear missiles which could reach the united states is another matter. The jews-only state can’t be far off such a missile given the sophistication of its space programme, "Since 19 September 1988, Israel has worked on its own satellite reconnaissance system to decrease reliance on U.S. sources. On that day, they launched the Offeq-1 satellite on the Shavit booster, a system closely related to the Jericho-II missile. They launched the satellite to the west away from the Arabs and against the earth's rotation, requiring even more thrust. The Jericho-II missile is capable of sending a one ton nuclear payload 5,000 kilometers. Offeq-2 went up on 3 April 1990. The launch of the Offeq-3 failed on its first attempt on 15 September 1994, but was successful 5 April 1995." (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003); "Israel is midway through a drive to establish a space program, much of it devoted to military purposes." (Yoichi Clark ' The Wrong Stuff' Pacific News Service http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15092 3.2.2003).
In recent years, however, the jews-only state has acquired four submarines from germany which it could arm with nuclear cruise missiles. Three were delivered a few years ago and a fourth more recently, "Israel’s acquisition from Germany a few years ago of three Dolphin-class submarines capable of launching conventional and nuclear-tipped cruise missiles? The 1,720-ton diesel-electric submarines are among the most technically advanced subs of their kind in the world. Each can be equipped with four cruise missiles, which Israel reportedly tested in the Indian Ocean in 1999. (Uzi Mahnaimi and Matthew Campbell, "Israel Makes Nuclear Waves with Submarine Missile Test," London Sunday Times, June 18, 2000) The subs will cruise the Mediterranean, the Red Sea, and, ominously, the Persian Gulf -which tends to confirm the views of the late Israeli scholar, Israel Shahak, a leading dissident, who argued that Israel’s strategic goal is hegemony from Morocco to Pakistan. (See Israel Shahak, Open Secrets, 1997, chapters four and eight)." (Mark Gaffney ‘Will Iran Be Next?’ http://informationclearinghouse.info/article3288.htm May 8th 2003).
So, even if the jews-only state does not yet have nuclear missiles which could reach america it has submarines which could probably traverse the oceans to bring america within range of its nuclear weapons. It is bizarre that america helped to fund the acquisition of these subs for the jews-only state. "In 1998, Yossi Melman wrote an aptly named article published in Haaretz called "Swimming With the Dolphins: Israel's New Dolphin Submarines, Built in Germany, Will Add a New Dimension to the Nuclear Arms Race in the Middle East". In this article he describes how George the Father HW Bush agreed to allow US funding to pay for Israel's submarines to be built in German shipyards but that the plan for new Dolphin submarines was not realized until the beginning of the Gulf War." (Mary La Rosa ‘Iran and Israel: The Ambiguous Nuclear Weapons’ http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story.php?sid=012006234222 January 22nd 2006).
As regards the vulnerability of the jews-only state because of its tiny size. In the 1960s, the soviet union was an unquestioned superpower which possessed a fairly efficient, but vastly powerful, military machine. The jews-only state then acquired a tiny number of nuclear weapons – primarily to protect the conquests it had made over neighbouring arab countries. However, even at that early stage, the jews-only state was also planning to develop a nuclear capability to defend itself against what seemed like the soviet union’s overwhelming nuclear superiority, "American-born Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard obtained satellite-imaging data of the Soviet Union, allowing Israel to target accurately Soviet cities. This showed Israel's intention to use its nuclear arsenal as a deterrent political lever, or retaliatory capability against the Soviet Union itself." (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003).
At that time, the soviet union may not have worried unduly about such a tiny nuclear threat from the jews-only state. Since then, however, there has been a dramatic turn around in the relative power between the jews-only state in palestine and russia. Such has been the calamitous political and economic decline of russia, and the prodigious political and economic development of the jews-only state that the latter is beginning to pose an increasingly serious threat to the former superpower. The existence of a jews-only state with a plethora of powerful nuclear weapons on russia's doorstep has now gone far beyond the realms of a modern cuban missile crisis in the middle east. It's a little difficult to credit it but basically a country with a mere six million people is getting closer to nuclear parity with a country of 120 million. Russia and the jewish state are now in a sort of mad predicament. Russia would be highly unlikely to launch a nuclear attack against the jews-only state because the jews would retaliate causing large scale losses in russia. However, this nuclear parity is deceptive. There is no equity between them so that in the maddest of situations, where the survival of one country or the other was at stake, the russians have the upper hand. Russia could completely obliterate the jews-only state making the country completely uninhabitable but the jews-only state could not do this to russia because of its vast size. True, it could make large parts of russia uninhabitable but the russian state and a substantial proportion of its population is almost certain to survive.
The irony of the situation in which the jews-only state wants to become so powerful that even the united states will fear to challenge it, is that the jews-only state in palestine seems to be able to obtain almost any military technology it wants from successive american governments without america being in the slightest bit worried about the military implications for its own national security. With each transfer of military technology and military hardware, the jews-only state becomes militarily stronger and thus more capable of striking a terrible blow to america. And yet since 1967, all american administrations have seemed perfectly willing to provide most types of military hardware and technology to the jews-only state. Americans have provided this support because they believe the jews-only state ensures stability in a politically turbulent region. That the jews-only state is the primary cause of the turbulence in the middle east suggests that the jews-only state, with the aid of the zionist owned american media and the zionist lobby in america, is capable of deceiving the american government and its people about its national interest. This was blatantly clear in 1973 when the americans shipped a vast quantity of weapons to the jews-only state to help it defeat the arab armies. The consequences of this military assistance was an arab oil embargo which drove the american and world economies into a recession. In other words, america could not see its own national interests and sacrificed its economic well-being to save the jews-only state.
The dominance of jewish interests over american interests could also be seen in april 2003 when the neocons pushed the bush administration into a proxy zionist war against iraq. The neocons hoped this would be the first of many zionist proxy wars against anti-zionist arab/moslem countries - devastating each country in virtually the same way as the jews-only state has devastated palestinian society.
For the neocons, america’s proxy zionist war against iraq was intended to defeat a country which posed a minimal challenge to the regional dominance of the jews-only state. They were not in the slightest bit concerned that america might struggle militarily against an iraqi insurgency which was predicted not only by many civilian commentators but by many in the american military itself. The proxy zionist war against iraq has ended up with america losing thousands of troops and suffering a huge financial strain on its economy. The zionists could not lose. The zionists would benefit if america was able to easily defeat iraq, and the moslem countries threatening the jews-only state whilst, conversely, they would also benefit if america struggled to defeat such countries and ended up weaker, militarily and economically, than before. If the zionists manage to extract more military hardware and advanced military technology from the americans during the occupation of iraq this will continue the process of reducing the huge disparity in military power between themselves and america. By far and away the biggest reduction in the military disparity between the jews-only state and america will occur if the zionists manage to develop, with or without america assistance, intercontinental nuclear missiles that could reach america. This will enable them to pose a considerable military threat to their main benefactor and protector.
The idea of the jews-only state possessing nuclear missiles which could threaten america is not an issue which is discussed in america. It is politically impossible for americans to discuss the nuclear threat from the jews-only state because american politicians do not recognize the existence of the jews-only state’s nuclear weapons. "The U.S. government has never acknowledged that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, even though the world knows otherwise, thanks to the whistleblower, Mordechai Vanunu. (London Sunday Times, Oct. 5, 1986) The continuing policy of denial can only hinder efforts to "rein in" Israel in the event of a nuclear crisis. One could hardly imagine a more explosive mix." (Mark Gaffney ‘Will Iran Be Next?’ http://informationclearinghouse.info/article3288.htm May 8th 2003).
This is quite remarkable. Perhaps americans are not concerned that yet another government is capable of launching nuclear missiles against their country. This seems to run counter to america’s national security and its national interests. Perhaps the reason why it has never become a political issue is because the american media and american politics is dominated by jews who are not worried about america being threatened by the jews-only state in palestine. Even more amazing is that american politicians do not seem in the least bit bothered about the jews-only state stealing american secrets or american military technology to help it develop nuclear missiles which could threaten america. But then again, america’s christian evangelists spend more of their time supporting the jews-only state in palestine than they do defending their own country from the israeli traitors stealing american technologies and threatening america’s security.
The critical question americans need to reflect upon, whilst they are boosting jewish supremacy in the middle east, donating vast subsidies to the jews-only state, and providing it with the world’s most sophisticated military technology, is whether it is in their interests to allow the jews-only state to develop nuclear weapons that could reach america. Given jewish dominance of the media it is highly likely the zionists will continue to keep the topic a part of the wide range of taboos about what jews are up to in america. If america continues to help the jews-only state acquire inter-continental wmds without discussing the political and military implications for american security this is a clear indication of zionist control over american politics. This leads to the conclusion that the jews-only state in palestine has colonized america and is currently treating it as a resource for its own benefit. If zionists control american politics and thus the american military then in effect they have world domination. There could be no clearer example of jewish world domination than america’s willingness to implement the foreign policies of another country, the jews-only state in palestine, and its failure to defend itself against its jewish colonisers.
Quite how the jews-only state would react if americans objected to zionists having inter-continental nuclear missiles which threatened america is not known. This would be a critical moment in zionist-american relationships.
Politically, the jews-only state has always been a bit of a military tart. "Over the last 50 years, Israel has been directly and indirectly aided and funded in its development of weapons of mass destruction by the United States, France, Norway, Britain and Germany." (Mary La Rosa ‘Iran and Israel: The Ambiguous Nuclear Weapons’ http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story.php?sid=012006234222 January 22nd 2006).
From the mid-1950s onwards, the jews-only state had a secret liaison with the french government which helped zionists build the nuclear power reactor that still provides the jews-only state with a constant supply of weapons grade nuclear material. "Israel began its search for nuclear weapons at the inception of the state in 1948. As payment for Israeli participation in the Suez Crisis of 1956, France provided nuclear expertise and constructed a reactor complex for Israel at Dimona capable of large-scale plutonium production and reprocessing. After French disengagement in the early 1960s, Israel progressed on its own, including through several covert operations, to project completion." (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003)."In the 1950s and into the early 1960s, France and Israel had close relations in many areas. France was Israel's principal arms supplier, and as instability spread through French colonies in North Africa, Israel provided valuable intelligence obtained from contacts with sephardic Jews in those countries." (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003).
The british also helped the jews-only state to acquire a consignment of norwegian heavy water. "Recently two British lawmakers have accused their government of a cover-up in trying to conceal the secret sale of heavy water to Israel in 1959. Although Britain maintains the deal and sale was only between Norway and Britain, admission comes now regarding prior knowledge of where that heavy water would find its final "home". A BBC report further claims that Brits took the water out of its own stockpile and loaded it on board Israeli ships. Documents also show that Britain was well aware of Israel seeking to buy uranium from South Africa." (Mary La Rosa ‘Iran and Israel: The Ambiguous Nuclear Weapons’ http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story.php?sid=012006234222 January 22nd 2006).
After the 1967 war, the jews-only state and the american government started drawing closer together. Despite their ever more intimate relationship, the jews-only state has not been content to rely solely upon the americans. Zionists' other major relationship during the late 1960s and 1970s was with the apartheid south african government which enabled them to test nuclear weapons and provided the jews-only state with more nuclear material. "During the Apartheid years Israel engaged in massive nuclear commerce with Pretoria, with effects that were felt throughout southern Africa. The alliance included trade in uranium, transfers of weapons technology, and cooperation in staging at least one joint nuclear test--for which Israel has never been held accountable. (See my book Dimona the Third Temple, 1989, chapters four and five) The relationship flourished for more than a decade." (Yossi Melman, "India's Visiting strongman Wants to Expand Nuclear Cooperation with Israel," Ha'aretz, June 16, 2000)." (Mark Gaffney ‘Will Iran Be Next?’ http://informationclearinghouse.info/article3288.htm May 8th 2003). It was the fall of south africa's apartheid government that forced the zionists to rely more upon america for political and military assistance.
Since the mid 1990s, the jews-only state has also been developing a closer relationship with the indian government, "India became the latest partner of convenience. By the year 2000 Israel’s nuclear commerce with India reportedly reached $500 million per year. (Yossi Melman, "India's Visiting strongman Wants to Expand Nuclear Cooperation with Israel," Ha'aretz, June 16, 2000)." (Mark Gaffney ‘Will Iran Be Next?’ http://informationclearinghouse.info/article3288.htm May 8th 2003); "Current military contacts between Israel and India, another nuclear power, bring up questions of nuclear cooperation. Pakistani sources have already voiced concerns over a possible joint Israeli-Indian attack on Pakistan's nuclear facilities." (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003). The indian government has also benefited considerably from this relationship not merely in refining their nuclear weapons but in suppressing moslems in kashmir. "Images of an Israeli pilot and an Indian-born civilian engineer drifting weightlessly alongside the other crew members from the U.S. military (in the space shuttle colombia) were interpreted as a threat across much of South Asia and the Middle East. In Kashmir, torn by a Muslim insurgency against Indian rule since 1947, the three partner countries India, Israel and the U.S. are referred to as "The Nexus." The connection goes back to Israeli instructors who have been training Indian troops to suppress the Muslim majority population in Kashmir using the brutal methods tested in the West Bank and Gaza Strip." (Yoichi Clark ' The Wrong Stuff' Pacific News Service http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15092 3.2.2003).
In conclusion, who could dispute that, in the future, this militaristic tart isn’t going to find another ally to provide it with more technologies to reach its goal of global dominance? One day the americans will find they have helped the jews-only state to attain such a level of military technological sophistication that their country will be in reach of zionists' nuclear missiles which could act as a serious deterrent on american security and american foreign policies. Of course, the jews-only state will then be in the same position with the united states that it is in with russia. Just like russia, the americans could wipe out the jews-only state but they would face a considerable nuclear backlash. It has to be wondered whether this is a price they would be willing to pay if the jews-only state became an implacable enemy.
It has to be suggested that the americans may well come to regret their licentiousness about the israeli fifth columnists within their midst. The american government has in the past been deceived by the jews-only state. In the early 1960s america was opposed to the jews-only state acquiring nuclear weapons. Zionists claimed their nuclear reactor in dimona was for peaceful nuclear power when it was being used solely for producing nuclear weapons. "In 1960, US military satellites determined that the reactor in Dimona might NOT be in existence for "peaceful" purpose, while the New York Times reported (Dec 19) what the CIA already knew.... that " officials are studying with mounting concern recent evidence indicating that Israel, with the assistance of France , may be developing the capacity to produce nuclear weapons" . The article further implied that Israel had been deceiving the United States in its nuclear ambitions. These realizations and sentiments did not deter Israel from achieving its goal via any and often nefarious means." (Mary La Rosa ‘Iran and Israel: The Ambiguous Nuclear Weapons’ http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story.php?sid=012006234222 January 22nd 2006); "The United States discovered the (dimona) facility by 1958 and it was a subject of continual discussions between American presidents and Israeli prime ministers. Israel used delay and deception to at first keep the United States at bay, and later used the nuclear option as a bargaining chip for a consistent American conventional arms supply." (Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army 'The Third Temple's Holy of Holies - Israel's Nuclear Weapons' The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 2 quoted in Lili 'Israel's 'Use' Of Its Nuclear Weapons Against US' RENSE.COM 26.2.2003). Who is to say the jews-only state won’t deceive america again? It ought to be added that no wonder that jews are so paranoid about iranians’ development of civil nuclear power given their own lies and deceptions about the origins of their own nuclear weapons.
The jews-only state has even been willing to steal nuclear material from america, "Also detailed is a company from Apollo, Pennsylvania , Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corp (NUMEC), owned and run by the son of an orthodox rabbi and ardent Zionist who strangely lost track of a certain amount of enriched uranium that was stored at the plant for legitimate US government contracts. Rafi Eitan, master mind in spying and stealing technological secrets, paid NUMEC a visit. More than 100 kilos of uranium disappeared and owner, Zalman Shapiro , did not report the loss. He feigned ignorance and ignorance and there was only enough evidence for the United States Atomic Energy Commission to shut the plant down and could not convict him." (Mary La Rosa ‘Iran and Israel: The Ambiguous Nuclear Weapons’ http://www.palestinechronicle.com/story.php?sid=012006234222 January 22nd 2006).
Americans ought to have serious doubts about their so-called jewish allies when the views of extremist politicians such as binyamin netanyahu, a former prime minister of the jews-only state, are considered. "U.S. intelligence sources report that the one Israeli who is considered an extreme threat to U.S. national security is former Prime Minister and current Prime Minister hopeful Binyamin Netanyahu. Not only has Netanyahu visited convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard in his North Carolina prison cell and advocated strenuously for his release but he was once overheard by an ex-CIA agent as saying to a group of his supporters, "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away." Considering the damage the neo-cons and their Israeli facilitators are causing for U.S. national security, Netanyahu may soon have his wish." (Wayne Madsen ‘The Neo-Cons’ Unfettered Access to America’s Secrets’ http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/exclusive1.htm September 2005).
Also posted on the mundi club website
posted by The Mundi Club @ 1:13 PM
<< Home