Saturday, January 29, 2005

The Israeli Traitors Running America’s Invasion of Iraq: Part One.

It was the israelis in the bush administration who pushed america into the proxy zionist war against iraq. The americans appointed israelis to take control of the country’s imperial administration. The american military is using israeli tactics to try and quell the iraqi insurrection. What is so shocking about america is not so much the invasion, the torture and brutal, high-tech, occupation but the scale of israeli influence over the americans. It’s almost as if these days americans cannot do anything by themselves without acting under the orders of the israeli traitors operating in the bush administration.

Israelis Push Americans into War against Iraq.
There are now many commentators who have argued that america’s invasion of iraq was instigated by the israelis in the bush administration. They wanted a proxy zionist war against iraq in order to protect the zionist state in palestine. For a list of these commentators please see

For example, "In an effort at damage control, the Israel lobby is making a concerted effort to smear whomever states the obvious: a great deal of the "intelligence" used to lie us into war came directly from Tel Aviv and was "stovepiped" into the White House by neocon White House advisors, and that, in retrospect, this war has been to the strategic advantage of one and only one nation on earth: Israel." (Justin Raimondo ‘Israel Unleashed: The real reason for the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history’ July 5, 2004).

One of the main israeli traitors involved in duping americans into the invasion of iraq was douglas feith, "Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith is the neocon Likudnik who was tasked with cooking up the false "intelligence" that President Bush used to deceive the U.S. public into supporting an illegal invasion of Iraq. With the U.S. military now trapped in the Iraqi quagmire, Feith wants the U.S. to attack Iran." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Dangerous Delusions About Iran’ December 14, 2004).

Zionists’ Corruption of the Pentagon.
Jeffrey blankfort highlights how zionists have corrupted the american military, "It is JINSA's second mandate that demands our attention. "Under a program called ‘Send a General to Israel,' hundreds of thousands of dollars of tax-deductible contributions bankroll an annual tour of Israel by retired U.S. generals and admirals." Judging from a look at JINSA's board of advisers, at least 25 of these ex-generals and retired admirals have subsequently been recruited into the organization, as have executives from a number of the major arms manufacturers."

As Vest noted: Almost every retired officer who sits on JINSA's board of advisers or has participated in its Israel trips or signed a JINSA letter works or has worked with military contractors who do business with the Pentagon and Israel. While some keep a low profile as self-employed "consultants" and avoid mention of their clients, others are less shy about their associations. In other words, what JINSA represents can best be described as the Military-Industrial-Israeli complex."

"Looking towards the future, JINSA makes sure it is not just generals and admirals who get the grand tour. It also provides a study program in Israel for cadets and midshipmen from the Naval Academy, West Point and the Air Force Academy, from whose ranks will come the next generation of generals and admirals. It should be noted that both of these programs are in keeping with the practice of Jewish organizations and federations across the country that routinely send public officials, such as mayors, supervisors, city councilors, police chiefs, etc. - the pool from which future members of Congress are likely to arise - on all-expense paid trips to Israel, thereby virtually assuring their support for the Jewish state in the future. No base is left uncovered."

"JINSA has been "industrious and persistent," writes Vest, and has "managed to weave a number of issues - support for national missile defense, opposition to arms control treaties, championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Turkey and American unilateralism in general - into a hard line, with support for the Israeli right at its core." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘A War for Israel’ c.2003).
Israeli Traitors in the Bush Administration appoint Zionists to take control of Iraq.
The israeli traitors in the bush administration appointed zionists or shabbat goys to run the iraqi imperial administration. The new pro-consul of iraq was supposed to be jay garner, a zionist. "First he (bush) was going to send Jay Garner. Then he suddenly switched off and sent Paul Bremer. I have it from insiders that in April, 2003, Jay Garner let it slip to some of his staff that his charge was to turn Iraq over to Ahmad Chalabi within six months. The staffers were shocked and some contacted the State Department to see if this was known there. It was not. So they blew the whistle on Bush with Colin Powell. I was told that Powell then made a coalition with Tony Blair and that the two of them went to Bush and got him to change his mind. The plan to put Chalabi in charge of Iraq was frankly idiotic. Chalabi had no grass roots. He was the one who had the bright idea to throw thousands of ex-Baathists into unemployment (which encouraged them to join the guerrilla resistance). This was why, as Kerry noted on Thursday night, Bush had done no real planning for the period after the war. He thought he had everything sewn up because Chalabi would handle it." (Juan Cole ‘Debate and Chalabi’ October 01, 2004). "Shortly after the war began, Chalabi, despite strenuous objection from the State Department and the CIA, was airlifted with his supporters into Iraq. He immediately began plans to establish a power base in his newly liberated country. Appointed by the U.S. to a position on the Iraqi Governing Council, Chalabi assumed the role of director of its economics and finance committee. He was able to place his close relatives and other allies in key ministries and directorships of institutions dealing with Iraq's banking, finance and oil resources. The spoils of war were now within his reach. In the relatively short period of time since the fall of the Ba`ath Party regime, IILG and Zell, Goldberg have facilitated contracts in the tens, possibly hundreds of millions of dollars." (James J. Zogby ‘Chalabi, Feith and Company: A Sordid Tale’ Washington Watch 31.05.2004). One can hardly imagine anything more likely to provoke hostility amongst iraqis than putting a zionist in charge given the damage that the zionist state has inflicted on iraq in the past.

Ahmad chalabi installed his nephew into positions of power within the provisional iraqi authority, "The nephew, it turns out, is even better than his uncle - or worse, depending on where you stand. He teamed up with a well-known Israeli militant hard-line Likud party member called Mark Zell, a leader of the Gush Emunim Israeli colonists' movement. Together, the two formed a company in Iraq to work on reconstruction. For years, Zell has been a driving force behind the "acquisition" of Palestinian land in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to build Jewish colonies on them. He is also close friend and former business partner of none other than Douglas Feith, the U.S. undersecretary of Defense for policy who reports directly to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the man with the last word on how money is spent in Iraq. Salem and Zell called their new Iraqi company "Iraq Law International". It describes its mission, according to Al Hayat, as "a boutique investment firm specialized in the new Iraq." Zell, on the other hand, formed an American company in Washington called Goldberg & Co. Its stated goal is "to assist American companies in forming relationships with the American government in the context of projects to rebuild the new Iraq," according to Al Hayat. The newspaper and several Iraqi businessmen interviewed separately say Zell and the young Chalabi have already secured several hundred million dollars worth of projects, thanks to Feith's discreet help, in the new Iraq." (Youssef M. Ibrahim ‘Ali Baba and the Israelis’ The Washington Times July 06 2004).

Americans supposedly invaded iraq to end the cruel regime of saddam hussein. Their torture of iraqis after the invasion was bad enough but it also exposed america’s dependence on the zionist state. The americans copied zionist torture methods. They employed zionists to torture iraqis.

America’s Cover up of Zionists’ Use of Torture in Palestine.
"Even as far back as a decade before the first Palestinian Intifada began in 1987, the U.S. government was already very much aware and complicitous in, the 'systematic torture' of Palestinians by Israel. In 1979 U.S. Foreign Service officers serving in the Jerusalem Consulate - an unofficial Embassy responsible for dealing with the Palestinians in the 'Occupied Territories' - did their job and provided the political leaders in Washington detailed and conclusive information about the ongoing torture of Palestinians. When top officials in Washington did nothing and in fact ordered everything covered up classified State Department cables were leaked from persons inside the State Department and published by Mark Bruzonsky who at the time was Forum Editor of The Middle East Magazine in London. Bruzonsky is now the Publisher of Mid-East Realities (MiddleEast.Org)." ( ‘Israeli Torture And US Complicity’ Mid-East Realities 6.05.04).

Americans copy Israeli Torture Techniques.
The torture methods that america used to force iraqi prisoners into becoming informers are the same as those used by the zionist state against palestinians. According to Mid-East Realities, "The U.S. and Israel have been torture interconnected in the Middle East for quite a long time. Those now infamous hoods - finally infamous because of the dramatic pictures from a U.S.-run prison in Iraq - have long been used by the Israelis in prisons where Palestinians are treated far worse but the world has looked the other way for decades now." (Mid-East Realities Israeli Torture And US Complicity 6.5.04 Wayne Madsen has argued, "Many of the torture methods were developed by the Israelis over many years of interrogating Arab prisoners on the occupied West Bank and in Israel itself. The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel documented the types of torture meted out on Arab prisoners. Many of the tactics coincide with those contained in the Taguba report: beatings and prolonged periods handcuffed to furniture. In an article in the December 1998 issue of The Progressive, Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb reported on the treatment given to a 23-year old Palestinian held on "administrative detention." The prisoner was "cuffed behind a chair 17 hours a day for 120 days . . . [he] had his head covered with a sack, which was often dipped in urine or feces. Guards played loud music right next to his ears and frequently taunted him with threats of physical and sexual violence." If additional photos and videos document such practices, the Bush administration and the American people have, indeed, "seen nothing yet."" (Wayne Madsen ‘The Israeli Torture Template Rape, Feces and Urine-Dipped Cloth Sacks’ 10.5.2004 counterpunch

Jinsa, the israeli run lobby group, proclaims the connections between the two, "Another area where Israel may have contributed valuable know-how is on the area of information extraction from high-level prisoners. Several fringe media sources noted that American forces had utilized interrogation methods considered to be successful that were learned from Israel where physical punishment is banned by law, the same as in the U.S. This story comes from one outlet - Jane’s Foreign Report of July 7, 2004 - and like the issue of the extent of Israeli training for U.S. forces, was also not deemed verifiable by the mainstream press. (Jonathan Howland, JINSA Editorial Assistant ‘Israel Assists U.S. Forces, Shares Lessons-Learned Fighting Terrorists: Fallujah Success Capitalized on IDF Know-How,2360,655,1701,2774 Dec 29, 2004).

Americans employ Zionists to Torture Iraqis.
Zionist officers showed the americans what methods could be used to transform civilians into informers. "The top Pentagon civilian officials - Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith - both Jewish and both known for their extremely close relationships with top officials in Israel and the Zionist movement, are believed to have personally authorized clandestine Mossad officials to be in Iraq working closely with U.S. military intelligence." ( ‘Israeli Torture And US Complicity’ Mid-East Realities 6.05.04).

"According to a political appointee within the Bush administration and U.S. intelligence sources, the interrogators at Abu Ghraib included a number of Arabic-speaking Israelis who also helped U.S. interrogators develop the "R2I" (Resistance to Interrogation) techniques. Although it is still largely undocumented if any of the contractor named in the report of General Antonio Taguba were associated with the Israeli military or intelligence services, it is noteworthy that one, John Israel, who was identified in the report as being employed by both CACI International of Arlington, Virginia, and Titan, Inc., of San Diego, may not have even been a U.S. citizen. In fact, the Taguba report does reference the presence of non-U.S. and non-Iraqi interrogators at Abu Ghraib. The report states, "In general, US civilian contract personnel (Titan Corporation, CACI, etc), third country nationals, and local contractors do not appear to be properly supervised within the detention facility at Abu Ghraib." When Rumsfeld had problems answering McCain's question, Lt. Gen. Lance Smith, the Deputy Commander of the U.S. Central Command, said there were 37 contract interrogators used in Abu Ghraib. The two named contractors, CACI and Titan, have close ties to the Israeli military and technology communities. Last January 14, after Provost Marshal General of the Army, Major General Donald Ryder, had already uncovered abuse at Abu Ghraib, CACI's President and CEO, Dr. J.P. (Jack) London was receiving the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah's Albert Einstein Technology award at the Jerusalem City Hall, with right-wing Likud politician Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz and ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism party Jerusalem Mayor Uri Lupolianski in attendance. Oddly, CACI waited until February 2 to publicly announce the award in a press release. CACI has also received grants from U.S.-Israeli bi-national foundations. Titan also has had close connections to Israeli interests. After his stint as CIA Director, James Woolsey served as a Titan director. Woolsey is an architect of America's Iraq policy and the chief proponent of and lobbyist for Ahmad Chalabi of the Iraqi National Congress. An adviser to the neo-conservative Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs, Project for the New American Century, Center for Security Policy, Freedom House, and Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, Woolsey is close to Stephen Cambone, the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, a key person in the chain of command who would have not only known about the torture tactics used by U.S. and Israeli interrogators in Iraq but who would have also approved them. Cambone was associated with the Project for the New American Century and is viewed as a member of Rumsfeld's neo-conservative "cabal" within the Pentagon." (Wayne Madsen ‘The Israeli Torture Template Rape, Feces and Urine-Dipped Cloth Sacks’ 10.5.2004 counterpunch

Americans invoke Israel as means of Torture.
Given the widespread hatred amongst iraqis for the zionist state in palestine, it was not surprising that symbols of the hated zionist state could be used as a means of blackmailing iraqi prisoners, "The Guardian notes that the American Civil Liberties Union acquired documents about the treatment of Guantanamo Bay prisoners that suggest that torture was used, and that it was actually authorized by President Bush. The documents also reveal that one torture technique was to wrap a prisoner in an Israeli flag. I'm puzzled by that one (my readers, incidentally, allege that the New York Times omitted to mention this particular technique, which was reported by the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post). My guess is that the prisoners' pictures were taken while wrapped in the Israeli flag, as a way of humiliating and possibly blackmailing them. You just have to scratch your head and wonder if the Bush administration is determined gradually to give supporting evidence for every single one of the anti-American stereotypes current in the Muslim world." (Juan Cole ‘Press Roundup for Wednesday 12/22’ December 22nd 2004).

Israelis in the Bush administration who gave permission for the use of these torture tactics.
According to seymour hersh, "The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie not in the criminal inclinations of a few Army reservists but in a decision, approved last year by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to expand a highly secret operation, which had been focussed on the hunt for Al Qaeda, to the interrogation of prisoners in Iraq. Rumsfeld’s decision embittered the American intelligence community, damaged the effectiveness of élite combat units, and hurt America’s prospects in the war on terror. According to interviews with several past and present American intelligence officials, the Pentagon’s operation, known inside the intelligence community by several code words, including Copper Green, encouraged physical coercion and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners in an effort to generate more intelligence about the growing insurgency in Iraq. A senior C.I.A. official, in confirming the details of this account last week, said that the operation stemmed from Rumsfeld’s long-standing desire to wrest control of America’s clandestine and paramilitary operations from the C.I.A. Rumsfeld … authorized the establishment of a highly secret program that was given blanket advance approval to kill or capture and, if possible, interrogate "high value" targets in the Bush Administration’s war on terror. A special-access program, or sap—subject to the Defense Department’s most stringent level of security - was set up, with an office in a secure area of the Pentagon. The program would recruit operatives and acquire the necessary equipment, including aircraft, and would keep its activities under wraps." (Seymour M Hersh ‘The Gray Zone’ The New Yorker 15.05.2004 (DMY)

Americans and Zionists dismiss the Geneva Convention.
"Taguba’s report, however, amounts to an unsparing study of collective wrongdoing and the failure of Army leadership at the highest levels. The picture he draws of Abu Ghraib is one in which Army regulations and the Geneva conventions were routinely violated, and in which much of the day-to-day management of the prisoners was abdicated to Army military-intelligence units and civilian contract employees. Interrogating prisoners and getting intelligence, including by intimidation and torture, was the priority." (Seymour M Hersh ‘Torture at Abu Ghraib The New Yorker 1.05.2004 (DMY)

"The United States has now matched Israel in its contempt for international law as the US has now declared to the world that it will no longer abide by the ABM treaty, nor by the Comprehensive Test Ban, put into place under Clinton, nor by the Chemical Weapons Treaty. It has rejected the Kyoto Accords, and also the Protocol to the Biological Weapons Conventions which was written to strengthen compliance with that treaty. And it has said that it will not honor the procedures of the recently formed International Criminal Court. The US repeatedly threatened the UN with irrelevancy in its run-up to the Iraq invasion. The administration has promulgated the new strategic doctrine that the United States will arrogate the right to pre-emptively attack any state which, in its view, might threaten its security at some indeterminate time in the indefinite future, which also happens to be a long standing Israeli military doctrine. That's what the Iraq war is about. This arrogant principle is a challenge to the very foundation of the United Nations and its prohibition against the non defensive use of force. The Bush administration and a strong viable and effective regime of international law cannot co-exist." (William James Martin ‘The Dogma of Richard Perle Zionism and Legal Skepticism’ Counterpunch July 1, 2004).

Americans adopt Israeli Constitution for Iraq.
The israelis in the bush administration employed zionists in order to help iraqis draw up a provisional constitution for their country.

The electoral system used to elect a constitutional assembly in iraq was based upon that of the zionist state in palestine, "The success or failure of the political process in Iraq anyway has nothing to do with yearning for democracy. It has to do with the frankly stupid policies implemented by the Bush administration in Iraq. If the whole enterprise goes bad, it won't be because the Iraqis couldn't live up to Mr. Langley's ideals. It will be because the Americans, especially the Neoconservatives, crafted a ridiculous electoral system based on that of Israel." (Juan Cole ‘Elections in Iraq will be Held on Schedule, But with What Result?’ November 28, 2004).

Zionists Sabotage America’s Post Invasion Planning.
In the early days after the invasion, commentators frequently pointed out that the americans did not seem to have any planning for the post-war political and industrial reconstruction of the country – even though bush proclaimed the invasion was to bring freedom and democracy to the iraqi people. As it turns out, the american state department had done the necessary planning – it was just ignored by the zionists in the bush administration because they do not want iraq to become industrially advanced and prosperous which would enable the country to rebuild its armed forces. These zionists prefer iraq to remain in a state of chaos and disorder than to become a stable, orderly, and civilized country that might one day turn against the zionist state. At the end of the day, they prefer iraqis to fight each other rather than fight the zionist state.

Jim lobe has pointed out that it was zionists in the bush administration who sabotaged post war development in iraq. "It was his (douglas feith) office that created shortly after 9/11 the Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group and the Office of Special Plans (OSP), which re-assessed 12 years of raw intelligence and the Arab press to find evidence of ties between the regime of former Iraq President Saddam Hussein and the al-Qaeda terrorist group. The OSP then ''stovepiped'' that information, unvetted by professional intelligence analysts, straight to Vice President Dick Cheney's office for use by the White House. Similarly, it was Feith's office, along with the Defense Policy Group (DPG), whose members Feith appointed, that served as the point of entry and influence for Iraqi National Congress (INC) chief Ahmed Chalabi and his ''defectors'' who provided phony intelligence about Hussein's vast stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). It was Feith's office that was charged with planning the post-war occupation and reconstruction process, and, in so doing, effectively excluded input from Iraqi experts from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and even from the Iraqi-American community, who had participated in a mammoth project that anticipated most of the problems occupation authorities have since encountered." (Jim Lobe ‘Soon to Be Losing Feith?’ 20.05.2004).

This view is supported by jon basil utley, "I should note that Feith, in his key policy planning position over the Pentagon, is also widely reported as the author of the plan to dismiss all the Iraqi soldiers and government officials, which has contributed so much to the chaos in Iraq. The book also says he blocked the State Department's planning for a civil administration to be ready right after the war. Correspondent Jim Lobe notes that Feith's former law partner is an attorney for Likud settlers on the West Bank. Many experts think that he promotes Sharon's wants, namely that Iraq be debilitated by chaos as a way of keeping it weak." (Jon Basil Utley ‘The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order’ July 8, 2004). Justin raimondo has joined the chorus, "Feith headed up the "Office of Special Plans," the lie factory that churned out "intelligence" cooked to neocon specifications. Feith's office was also put in charge of post-war planning, and it was he who rejected carefully prepared studies made by the CIA and the State Department, whose analysts foresaw many of the problems and pitfalls that are killing American soldiers in increasing numbers." (Justin Raimondo ‘The Neoconning of America: Neoconservatives under fire – and it's David Brooks to the barricades!’ January 7, 2004).

Jim lobe has also argued that, "The OSP also excluded many top Mideast experts from the State Department from playing any role in the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in Iraq." (Jim Lobe ‘Feith is the Answer’ Inter Press News Service Agency Nov 5 2003).

Zionists’ Disband the Iraqi Military.
After the invasion of iraq, the most critical decision feith made was disbanding the iraqi military and police - a decision carried out by the coalition provisional authority. This was almost the cpa’s first act and was one which, more than any other, shaped the course of events to the present time. It was one thing to try and carry out the debaathification of the iraqi military and police – it was quite another matter to disband the military and police in their entirety. This decision gave an enormous boost to the iraqi insurgency movement. Firstly, because many of the iraqis with military/police training were then free to use their skills to liberate their country from the zionist- american occupiers. And, secondly, the message that this sent out to every iraqi was that the zionists in the american administration were intent on keeping iraq defenceless against any military threat from its neighbours or the zionist state – something which many iraqis found repellant and humiliating and drove them into active or at the very least passive support for the nationalist cause.

The disbanding of the iraqi military was clearly a political decision to appease the zionist state in palestine. It was a decision made by zionists in the american administration to benefit the zionist state. It was a strikingly inept decision militarily because it led to a huge popular rebellion against the american occupation of iraq. However, it is a good example of the fatal consequences for americans of zionist domination over the american government. In effect, zionists in the american government implemented a policy which was politically advantageous to the zionist state whilst militarily endangering the lives of american troops. According to juan cole, "It was these Washington Institute for Near East Policy and AIPAC-linked US Likud backers in the Defense Department who had the Iraqi army dissolved as soon as Saddam was overthrown. This step threw Iraq into chaos and led to the deaths of nearly a thousand US servicemen so far, since an Iraq without an army would inevitably depend on the US military." (Juan Cole ‘Israeli Spy in Pentagon Linked to AIPAC’ August 28, 2004). There could be little more clear cut line of responsibility - zionists are responsible for killing americans. (Cole has pointed out that in the 1980s, AIPAC set up the Washington Institute for Near East Policy as a pro-Israeli alternative to the Brookings Institution, which it perceived to be insufficiently supportive of Israel).