The Israeli Traitors Running America’s Invasion of Iraq: Part Two
Zionists Sabotaging Humanitarian Assistance to Iraq."Interference by the Pentagon delivered a massive blow to efforts to provide humanitarian relief for Iraq after last year's war, according to two US aid experts who struggled with the conflict's chaotic aftermath. The traditional American response to humanitarian emergencies and natural disasters abroad is carried out by the State Department's US Agency for International Development (USAID) and Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA). In the months leading up to the war, these agencies trained up an 80-person team specially for Iraq, many of them with long expertise in emergencies, says the commentary, published by Frederick Burkle and Eric Noji in Saturday's Lancet. But that initiative was hamstrung by the Pentagon which, breaking with tradition, decided to set up its own humanitarian planning team, say the authors. As confusion mounted between the rival State Department and Pentagon relief initiatives, the US government decided to give overall administrative control to the Department of Defense's team - by now named the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance (ORHA). Meanwhile, the ORHA team that was rushed to Baghdad was mainly staffed by policy wonks, it says. They had little field experience in relief operations, many were ignorant of functions, charter and capabilities of UN agencies, Red Cross organisations or NGOs, and they simply created another unnecessary level of bureaucracy. Many of these (non-governmental) agencies distanced themselves, fearful that their reputation for neutrality would be compromised on the ground if they had to work with occupying troops, say Burkle and Noji. "The situation was further complicated by the fact that the (Pentagon) humanitarian planning team, citing secrecy, refused to disclose crucial information needed for planning not only to international relief organisations but also to other US military, government and civilian agencies working on humanitarian relief," they add." (Pentagon meddling crippled post-war humanitarian aid for Iraq: US experts’ http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1512&amp;ncid=723&e=10&u=/afp/20041007/wl_afp/iraq_health_us Oct 7 2004).Zionists Controlling the Reconstruction of Iraq.The chalabis were close allies of the zionists, "In come the new Ali Babas: Israelis teaming up with the Chalabis and the neo-conservative businessmen cabal that runs the Pentagon, holding the purse to reconstruct Iraq. The arrival of the Israelis in Iraq is being orchestrated by one Salem Chalabi, 41, the executive director of the tribunal before which Saddam Hussein, Tariq Aziz and other former Iraqi regime officials appeared last Thursday. He also happens to be the nephew of the now widely discredited Ahmed Chalabi, once the Pentagon's favorite boy for the leadership of Iraq who has since fallen out of favor but still has his tentacles all over Iraq. The nephew, it turns out, is even better than his uncle - or worse, depending on where you stand. He teamed up with a well-known Israeli militant hard-line Likud party member called Mark Zell, a leader of the Gush Emunim Israeli colonists' movement. Together, the two formed a company in Iraq to work on reconstruction. For years, Zell has been a driving force behind the "acquisition" of Palestinian land in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to build Jewish colonies on them. He is also close friend and former business partner of none other than Douglas Feith, the U.S. undersecretary of Defense for policy who reports directly to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the man with the last word on how money is spent in Iraq. Salem and Zell called their new Iraqi company "Iraq Law International". It describes its mission, according to Al Hayat, as "a boutique investment firm specialized in the new Iraq." Zell, on the other hand, formed an American company in Washington called Goldberg & Co. Its stated goal is "to assist American companies in forming relationships with the American government in the context of projects to rebuild the new Iraq," according to Al Hayat. The newspaper and several Iraqi businessmen interviewed separately say Zell and the young Chalabi have already secured several hundred million dollars worth of projects, thanks to Feith's discreet help, in the new Iraq." (Youssef M. Ibrahim ‘Ali Baba and the Israelis’ The Washington Times http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20040706-112131-6976r.htm July 06 2004).The americans also relied on the U.S. Agency for International Development to help bring about the reconstruction of iraq, "Still, it’s not easy determining why the biggest power plant in Iraq’s largest city seems to be such a low priority. Baghdad is still beset by blackouts, and so much of America’s success or failure depends on power: the economy can’t recover without it. The next logical place to ask is the U.S. Agency for International Development, which gave Bechtel the contract last April. Questioned by NEWSWEEK about Daura, USAID chief Andrew Natsios referred to a priority list drawn up by a coordinating committee under the Coalition Provisional Authority - the chief occupying power - and said he didn’t know where Daura was on it. His aide said the CPA would know. No, Natsios said, he thought Bechtel would know. But Bechtel’s Menaker responded: "We perform the work tasked to us by USAID. We don’t make decisions on priorities. USAID and CPA make those decisions." Some CPA officials concede privately that the problem stems from the lack of preparation before the war. "It always comes back to the same thing: no plan," says one CPA staffer." (Rod Nordland and Michael Hirsh ‘ $87 Billion Money Pit’ Newsweek http://www.msnbc.com/news/985304.asp 3.11.2003). It ought to be noted that usaid also has offices in the zionist state in palestine so perhaps its iraqi offices were staffed by zionist loving people from the zionist state.
America’s Military Tactics.Americans adopt Israeli Military Tactics to Quosh Iraqi Freedom Fighters.The tactics adopted by the american army in trying to suppress the revolt in fallujah were no different from those used by the zionist army in suppressing the palestinians. What the zionists did in jenin in 2002 was virtually copied by the americans in fallujah in 2004. Both armies simply demolished the cities where the rebels were supposed to be hiding out. Both used bulldozers as machines of war. "When Sharon tries to prevent Palestinian statehood, Iraqis remember that his closest ally is represented in Iraq by an army which most of them regard as occupiers. When US forces learn their guerrilla warfare techniques from the Israelis - when they bomb houses from the air, when they abuse prisoners, when they even erect razor-wire round recalcitrant villages - is it surprising that Iraqis treat the Americans as surrogate Israelis?" (Robert Fisk ‘In This Mire Of Death, Lies And Atrocities, We Glimpse The Ghost Of Vietnam’ http://globalecho.org/view_article.php?aid=2750 December 28th 2004).Jinsa proclaims the help that the zionist army has been providing for the american army, "Some of Israel’s most valued contributions to Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) were its advice on erecting and manning roadblocks and checkpoints, and techniques for tracking suspected terrorist using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). More specific assistance has reportedly come in the form of aerial surveillance equipment, decoy drones, and the use of armored construction equipment to clear booby-trapped structures, according to Reuters, December 12, 2003. In Fallujah, Israeli mine-clearing and wall-breaching methods were employed. Opening holes in walls allows U.S. troops to bypass explosive devices on booby-trapped doors. It is also used to create paths through adjoining buildings limiting soldiers’ exposure to enemy fire in narrow alleyways and on open streets." (Jonathan Howland, JINSA Editorial Assistant ‘Israel Assists U.S. Forces, Shares Lessons-Learned Fighting Terrorists: Fallujah Success Capitalized on IDF Know-How http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/1701/documentid/2774/history/3,2360,655,1701,2774 Dec 29, 2004).Isn’t it a little strange that america is learning occupation techniques from the zionist state’s occupation of palestine when it supposedly invaded iraq in order to liberate iraqis from a brutal dictator?
American Army trained in the Zionist State."Army and Marine Corps forces that battled terrorist insurgents in the Iraqi cities of Fallujah and Mosul employed urban warfare tactics gleaned from the combat experience of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). In the last two years, hundreds of U.S. military personnel have trained in the Negev desert at Israel’s Adam counter insurgency urban warfare training facility. Meanwhile, the U.S. military has completed the construction of a number of simulated Arab villages at the U.S. Army’s Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC) at Fort Polk, Louisiana. In a letter to Army Magazine in July 2003, Brig. Gen. Michael Vane - Deputy Chief of Staff at the U.S. Army’s Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) - wrote that U.S. officers had recently "traveled to Israel to glean lessons learned from their [Israeli] counterterrorist operations in urban areas." Later, an unnamed U.S. official told the World Tribune, November 10, 2004, "We have learned a lot regarding urban warfare tactics in the Middle East from our allies - yes, this includes Israel. IDF soldiers train at the Adam counter insurgency urban warfare training facility in Israel. At the JRTC, the U.S. Army simulates everything from local government meetings, religious protests, and mobs angry over an absence of electrical power or water, and attacks by insurgents, according to the Associated Press (AP), February 14, 2004. The Department of Defense predicts that by 2010, 75 percent of the world’s population will live in or around urban centers, making urban warfare training a priority for the military. In 2003, the fringe media reported that Israeli commandos were training U.S. Special Forces at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. The story, apparently lacking sufficient sources, was not picked up by the mainstream media. AP, however, reported on December 13, that a large TRADOC delegation visited Israel that year. Anonymous sources said the focus of the meeting was urban warfare tactics learned from the IDF incursions into Jenin and the Gaza Strip in 2002. Israeli officials issued a statement declining to comment on "ongoing strategic cooperation between the U.S. and the Israeli military." (Jonathan Howland, JINSA Editorial Assistant ‘Israel Assists U.S. Forces, Shares Lessons-Learned Fighting Terrorists: Fallujah Success Capitalized on IDF Know-How http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/1701/documentid/2774/history/3,2360,655,1701,2774 Dec 29, 2004).Israelis Help Americans to Demolish Fallujah.The americans used israelis in the fight to demolish fallujah, "It has become clear that Israel played a major role in the battle for Fallujah, despite the American concern to conceal this fact. What news leaked of officers, soldiers, and even rabbis of dual citizenships that took part in the battles, some of which were killed by the resistance's bullets, is only the tip of the iceberg. The killing of an Israeli officer in Fallujah exposed the existence of a large number of officers, snipers, and paratroopers in Iraq. Based on Israeli press statistics, Israel currently has no fewer than 1,000 officers and soldiers scattered around the American units working in Iraq. In addition, 37 rabbis are operating within the American troops, which leads to believe that the real number is greater; since Ha'aretz admitted that others are concealing their Jewish identities, which makes them self-driven Israeli citizens." (Rashid Khashana ‘Israel's Battle in Fallujah’ http://english.daralhayat.com/opinion/OPED/11-2004/Article-20041122-611bf698-c0a8-10ed-002f-992445bfcb5c/story.html November 22nd 2004). Americans adopt Zionists’ Palestinianization Policy.Pictures of the american military bombing and destroying iraqi homes in an effort to root out so-called iraqi terrorists/moslem fundamentalists are all too reminiscent of zionists’ invasions of palestinian areas. In the latter case, the zionist military does not merely try to exterminate palestinian terrorists, it also aims at destroying palestinian homes, businesses, and infrastructure, to force as many palestinians as possible into poverty. It also tries to destroy the spirits of the palestinian people so that with nothing left in palestine they are forced into exile. The oppressive tactics used by the american military in iraq are copied from the zionists’ tactics for the oppression of palestinians just as the torture methods used by the american military at guantanamo bay and iraq have been copied from the zionists’ torture of palestinians. The american military, corrupted by the zionists in the bush administration, has become as diabolically evil as its zionist chums.
The americans are reducing iraq to rubble in the same way as the zionists are reducing palestine to rubble. The americans have adopted the zionists’ palestinianization tactic in iraq.Kurt nimmo has concluded, "I also believe it is no mistake U.S. "military planners" are using what are essentially Israeli tactics in Iraq .. "(Kurt Nimmo ‘Iraqi Suicide Bombings: the Strausscons and Likudites Sowing Chaos’ http://kurtnimmo.com/blog/index.php?p=433 November 23, 2004).Pepe escobar has concluded, "As for the Iraqi "model", the crucial point is that the Americans managed to turn Iraq into a replica of Palestine - the same ghastly litany of occupation, suicide bombings, streams of refugees and death and destruction. Not only was the Iraq war entirely based on neo-con lies: these lies led, among other disasters, to Iraq's infrastructure being completely destroyed and the US alienating the Muslim world. Fallujah and Baghdad are replicas of Gaza and the West Bank." (Pepe Escobar ‘The Roving Eye: Evildoers, here we come’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL17Ak01.html December 17th 2004).Whilst the american invasion and occupation of iraq seems to be an entirely american operation, it is almost entirely being run either by israelis or along israeli lines.
The Zionist Assassination of Yassin leads to the Deaths of Four Americans and the Seige of Fallujah.On march 25th 2004 the zionist state assassinated hamas’s spiritual leader, sheikh ahmed yassin. This led to rioting in iraq in which brutish troops were hurt. See channel five news report on the incident. (The video clip is - 1mb and 31 seconds long). Here is a concrete evidence that what the zionist government does in palestine is leading to the endangerment of american and brutish troops in iraq.
Iraqi nationalists responded to the zionist state’s assassination of yassin by kidnapping four american security guards working in iraqi. According to juan cole, "There is increasing evidence that the brutal attack on the American security guards in Fallujah, and the desecration of their bodies, was the work of Islamists seeking vengeance for the Israeli murder of Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. Leaflets found at the scene said the operation was in the name of Yassin. al-Hayat reports in its Friday edition that responsibility for the attack has been taken by a group called Phalanges of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. The group said the deaths were a "gift to the Palestinian people." You put yourself in the shoes of an American military commander in Fallujah. He treats with the local clan leaders and Sunni clergy. He tries to get them on the side of the US. He faces hostility, but he is making some progress. And then Ariel Sharon sends US-made helicopter gunships to Gaza and has them fire missiles at people coming out of a mosque, killing 8 and wounding 24. One of the dead is a half-blind paraplegic Islamist named Sheikh Yassin. He could have easily been arrested, and had been in the 1990s. But he was incinerated in a piece of state terror instead. And all of a sudden the people of Fallujah in Iraq are pointing their fingers at the American troops and saying, 'you did this. You gave Sharon the green light.' And all the commander's hard work in building bridges collapses over night. And four US security personnel are dead, and 5 US troops are dead, and the fighting flares up. Thanks, Prime Minister Sharon. Thank you very much." (Juan Cole ‘Deaths of Americans in Fallujah: In revenge for Sharon's Murder of Sheikh Yassin?’ http://www.juancole.com/ 2.04.2004).
The slaughter, and hideous mutilation, of four americans led to the american army invading fallujah causing the loss of many innocent iraqi civilians and a few american troops. Rachelle marshall has stated, "A few days later, after four American security guards were killed in Fallujah and their bodies burned by a crowd, Marines responded by laying siege to the city. When Iraqis fought back, U.S. warplanes dropped 500-pound bombs on houses where the gunmen were thought to be hiding, Apache helicopters fired missiles into residential neighborhoods, and AC-130 gunships strafed the streets. An American soldier said he saw a helicopter fire a missile at a man holding a slingshot; a woman hanging laundry was killed along with several relatives when a missile destroyed their house; a severely wounded woman arrived at a hospital still holding a white flag." (Rachelle Marshall ‘The Fact Behind the Fictions: the U.S. and Israel Plan Permanent Occupations’ Washington Report on Middle East Affairs June 2004, pages 6-8). The americans’ seige of fallujah was called off only when it was realized that the price of invading the city would have been completely out of proportion to the initial reasons for the invasion. However, here was a clear cut example of the spiral of violence starting off with the zionists in palestine and then ending up in iraq leading to the loss of iraqi and american lives.
The Israeli Traitors Running America’s Invasion of Iraq: Part One.
It was the israelis in the bush administration who pushed america into the proxy zionist war against iraq. The americans appointed israelis to take control of the country’s imperial administration. The american military is using israeli tactics to try and quell the iraqi insurrection. What is so shocking about america is not so much the invasion, the torture and brutal, high-tech, occupation but the scale of israeli influence over the americans. It’s almost as if these days americans cannot do anything by themselves without acting under the orders of the israeli traitors operating in the bush administration.
Israelis Push Americans into War against Iraq.
There are now many commentators who have argued that america’s invasion of iraq was instigated by the israelis in the bush administration. They wanted a proxy zionist war against iraq in order to protect the zionist state in palestine. For a list of these commentators please see http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/MCtfirm/10tf26/10tf26k.html
For example, "In an effort at damage control, the Israel lobby is making a concerted effort to smear whomever states the obvious: a great deal of the "intelligence" used to lie us into war came directly from Tel Aviv and was "stovepiped" into the White House by neocon White House advisors, and that, in retrospect, this war has been to the strategic advantage of one and only one nation on earth: Israel." (Justin Raimondo ‘Israel Unleashed: The real reason for the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history’ antiwar.com http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=2933 July 5, 2004).
One of the main israeli traitors involved in duping americans into the invasion of iraq was douglas feith, "Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith is the neocon Likudnik who was tasked with cooking up the false "intelligence" that President Bush used to deceive the U.S. public into supporting an illegal invasion of Iraq. With the U.S. military now trapped in the Iraqi quagmire, Feith wants the U.S. to attack Iran." (Paul Craig Roberts ‘Dangerous Delusions About Iran’ http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=4160 December 14, 2004).
Zionists’ Corruption of the Pentagon.
Jeffrey blankfort highlights how zionists have corrupted the american military, "It is JINSA's second mandate that demands our attention. "Under a program called ‘Send a General to Israel,' hundreds of thousands of dollars of tax-deductible contributions bankroll an annual tour of Israel by retired U.S. generals and admirals." Judging from a look at JINSA's board of advisers, at least 25 of these ex-generals and retired admirals have subsequently been recruited into the organization, as have executives from a number of the major arms manufacturers."
As Vest noted: Almost every retired officer who sits on JINSA's board of advisers or has participated in its Israel trips or signed a JINSA letter works or has worked with military contractors who do business with the Pentagon and Israel. While some keep a low profile as self-employed "consultants" and avoid mention of their clients, others are less shy about their associations. In other words, what JINSA represents can best be described as the Military-Industrial-Israeli complex."
"Looking towards the future, JINSA makes sure it is not just generals and admirals who get the grand tour. It also provides a study program in Israel for cadets and midshipmen from the Naval Academy, West Point and the Air Force Academy, from whose ranks will come the next generation of generals and admirals. It should be noted that both of these programs are in keeping with the practice of Jewish organizations and federations across the country that routinely send public officials, such as mayors, supervisors, city councilors, police chiefs, etc. - the pool from which future members of Congress are likely to arise - on all-expense paid trips to Israel, thereby virtually assuring their support for the Jewish state in the future. No base is left uncovered."
"JINSA has been "industrious and persistent," writes Vest, and has "managed to weave a number of issues - support for national missile defense, opposition to arms control treaties, championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Turkey and American unilateralism in general - into a hard line, with support for the Israeli right at its core." (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘A War for Israel’ http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html c.2003).
Israeli Traitors in the Bush Administration appoint Zionists to take control of Iraq.
The israeli traitors in the bush administration appointed zionists or shabbat goys to run the iraqi imperial administration. The new pro-consul of iraq was supposed to be jay garner, a zionist. "First he (bush) was going to send Jay Garner. Then he suddenly switched off and sent Paul Bremer. I have it from insiders that in April, 2003, Jay Garner let it slip to some of his staff that his charge was to turn Iraq over to Ahmad Chalabi within six months. The staffers were shocked and some contacted the State Department to see if this was known there. It was not. So they blew the whistle on Bush with Colin Powell. I was told that Powell then made a coalition with Tony Blair and that the two of them went to Bush and got him to change his mind. The plan to put Chalabi in charge of Iraq was frankly idiotic. Chalabi had no grass roots. He was the one who had the bright idea to throw thousands of ex-Baathists into unemployment (which encouraged them to join the guerrilla resistance). This was why, as Kerry noted on Thursday night, Bush had done no real planning for the period after the war. He thought he had everything sewn up because Chalabi would handle it." (Juan Cole ‘Debate and Chalabi’ http://www.juancole.com/ October 01, 2004). "Shortly after the war began, Chalabi, despite strenuous objection from the State Department and the CIA, was airlifted with his supporters into Iraq. He immediately began plans to establish a power base in his newly liberated country. Appointed by the U.S. to a position on the Iraqi Governing Council, Chalabi assumed the role of director of its economics and finance committee. He was able to place his close relatives and other allies in key ministries and directorships of institutions dealing with Iraq's banking, finance and oil resources. The spoils of war were now within his reach. In the relatively short period of time since the fall of the Ba`ath Party regime, IILG and Zell, Goldberg have facilitated contracts in the tens, possibly hundreds of millions of dollars." (James J. Zogby ‘Chalabi, Feith and Company: A Sordid Tale’ Washington Watch http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=15862 31.05.2004). One can hardly imagine anything more likely to provoke hostility amongst iraqis than putting a zionist in charge given the damage that the zionist state has inflicted on iraq in the past.
Ahmad chalabi installed his nephew into positions of power within the provisional iraqi authority, "The nephew, it turns out, is even better than his uncle - or worse, depending on where you stand. He teamed up with a well-known Israeli militant hard-line Likud party member called Mark Zell, a leader of the Gush Emunim Israeli colonists' movement. Together, the two formed a company in Iraq to work on reconstruction. For years, Zell has been a driving force behind the "acquisition" of Palestinian land in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to build Jewish colonies on them. He is also close friend and former business partner of none other than Douglas Feith, the U.S. undersecretary of Defense for policy who reports directly to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the man with the last word on how money is spent in Iraq. Salem and Zell called their new Iraqi company "Iraq Law International". It describes its mission, according to Al Hayat, as "a boutique investment firm specialized in the new Iraq." Zell, on the other hand, formed an American company in Washington called Goldberg & Co. Its stated goal is "to assist American companies in forming relationships with the American government in the context of projects to rebuild the new Iraq," according to Al Hayat. The newspaper and several Iraqi businessmen interviewed separately say Zell and the young Chalabi have already secured several hundred million dollars worth of projects, thanks to Feith's discreet help, in the new Iraq." (Youssef M. Ibrahim ‘Ali Baba and the Israelis’ The Washington Times http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20040706-112131-6976r.htm July 06 2004).
Americans supposedly invaded iraq to end the cruel regime of saddam hussein. Their torture of iraqis after the invasion was bad enough but it also exposed america’s dependence on the zionist state. The americans copied zionist torture methods. They employed zionists to torture iraqis.
America’s Cover up of Zionists’ Use of Torture in Palestine.
"Even as far back as a decade before the first Palestinian Intifada began in 1987, the U.S. government was already very much aware and complicitous in, the 'systematic torture' of Palestinians by Israel. In 1979 U.S. Foreign Service officers serving in the Jerusalem Consulate - an unofficial Embassy responsible for dealing with the Palestinians in the 'Occupied Territories' - did their job and provided the political leaders in Washington detailed and conclusive information about the ongoing torture of Palestinians. When top officials in Washington did nothing and in fact ordered everything covered up classified State Department cables were leaked from persons inside the State Department and published by Mark Bruzonsky who at the time was Forum Editor of The Middle East Magazine in London. Bruzonsky is now the Publisher of Mid-East Realities (MiddleEast.Org)." (Rense.com ‘Israeli Torture And US Complicity’ Mid-East Realities 6.05.04).
Americans copy Israeli Torture Techniques.
The torture methods that america used to force iraqi prisoners into becoming informers are the same as those used by the zionist state against palestinians. According to Mid-East Realities, "The U.S. and Israel have been torture interconnected in the Middle East for quite a long time. Those now infamous hoods - finally infamous because of the dramatic pictures from a U.S.-run prison in Iraq - have long been used by the Israelis in prisons where Palestinians are treated far worse but the world has looked the other way for decades now." (Mid-East Realities Israeli Torture And US Complicity 6.5.04 Rense.com). Wayne Madsen has argued, "Many of the torture methods were developed by the Israelis over many years of interrogating Arab prisoners on the occupied West Bank and in Israel itself. The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel documented the types of torture meted out on Arab prisoners. Many of the tactics coincide with those contained in the Taguba report: beatings and prolonged periods handcuffed to furniture. In an article in the December 1998 issue of The Progressive, Rabbi Lynn Gottlieb reported on the treatment given to a 23-year old Palestinian held on "administrative detention." The prisoner was "cuffed behind a chair 17 hours a day for 120 days . . . [he] had his head covered with a sack, which was often dipped in urine or feces. Guards played loud music right next to his ears and frequently taunted him with threats of physical and sexual violence." If additional photos and videos document such practices, the Bush administration and the American people have, indeed, "seen nothing yet."" (Wayne Madsen ‘The Israeli Torture Template Rape, Feces and Urine-Dipped Cloth Sacks’ 10.5.2004 counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/madsen05102004.html).
Jinsa, the israeli run lobby group, proclaims the connections between the two, "Another area where Israel may have contributed valuable know-how is on the area of information extraction from high-level prisoners. Several fringe media sources noted that American forces had utilized interrogation methods considered to be successful that were learned from Israel where physical punishment is banned by law, the same as in the U.S. This story comes from one outlet - Jane’s Foreign Report of July 7, 2004 - and like the issue of the extent of Israeli training for U.S. forces, was also not deemed verifiable by the mainstream press. (Jonathan Howland, JINSA Editorial Assistant ‘Israel Assists U.S. Forces, Shares Lessons-Learned Fighting Terrorists: Fallujah Success Capitalized on IDF Know-How http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articles.html/function/view/categoryid/1701/documentid/2774/history/3,2360,655,1701,2774 Dec 29, 2004).
Americans employ Zionists to Torture Iraqis.
Zionist officers showed the americans what methods could be used to transform civilians into informers. "The top Pentagon civilian officials - Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith - both Jewish and both known for their extremely close relationships with top officials in Israel and the Zionist movement, are believed to have personally authorized clandestine Mossad officials to be in Iraq working closely with U.S. military intelligence." (Rense.com ‘Israeli Torture And US Complicity’ Mid-East Realities 6.05.04).
"According to a political appointee within the Bush administration and U.S. intelligence sources, the interrogators at Abu Ghraib included a number of Arabic-speaking Israelis who also helped U.S. interrogators develop the "R2I" (Resistance to Interrogation) techniques. Although it is still largely undocumented if any of the contractor named in the report of General Antonio Taguba were associated with the Israeli military or intelligence services, it is noteworthy that one, John Israel, who was identified in the report as being employed by both CACI International of Arlington, Virginia, and Titan, Inc., of San Diego, may not have even been a U.S. citizen. In fact, the Taguba report does reference the presence of non-U.S. and non-Iraqi interrogators at Abu Ghraib. The report states, "In general, US civilian contract personnel (Titan Corporation, CACI, etc), third country nationals, and local contractors do not appear to be properly supervised within the detention facility at Abu Ghraib." When Rumsfeld had problems answering McCain's question, Lt. Gen. Lance Smith, the Deputy Commander of the U.S. Central Command, said there were 37 contract interrogators used in Abu Ghraib. The two named contractors, CACI and Titan, have close ties to the Israeli military and technology communities. Last January 14, after Provost Marshal General of the Army, Major General Donald Ryder, had already uncovered abuse at Abu Ghraib, CACI's President and CEO, Dr. J.P. (Jack) London was receiving the Jerusalem Fund of Aish HaTorah's Albert Einstein Technology award at the Jerusalem City Hall, with right-wing Likud politician Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz and ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism party Jerusalem Mayor Uri Lupolianski in attendance. Oddly, CACI waited until February 2 to publicly announce the award in a press release. CACI has also received grants from U.S.-Israeli bi-national foundations. Titan also has had close connections to Israeli interests. After his stint as CIA Director, James Woolsey served as a Titan director. Woolsey is an architect of America's Iraq policy and the chief proponent of and lobbyist for Ahmad Chalabi of the Iraqi National Congress. An adviser to the neo-conservative Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs, Project for the New American Century, Center for Security Policy, Freedom House, and Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, Woolsey is close to Stephen Cambone, the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, a key person in the chain of command who would have not only known about the torture tactics used by U.S. and Israeli interrogators in Iraq but who would have also approved them. Cambone was associated with the Project for the New American Century and is viewed as a member of Rumsfeld's neo-conservative "cabal" within the Pentagon." (Wayne Madsen ‘The Israeli Torture Template Rape, Feces and Urine-Dipped Cloth Sacks’ 10.5.2004 counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/madsen05102004.html).
Americans invoke Israel as means of Torture.
Given the widespread hatred amongst iraqis for the zionist state in palestine, it was not surprising that symbols of the hated zionist state could be used as a means of blackmailing iraqi prisoners, "The Guardian notes that the American Civil Liberties Union acquired documents about the treatment of Guantanamo Bay prisoners that suggest that torture was used, and that it was actually authorized by President Bush. The documents also reveal that one torture technique was to wrap a prisoner in an Israeli flag. I'm puzzled by that one (my readers, incidentally, allege that the New York Times omitted to mention this particular technique, which was reported by the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post). My guess is that the prisoners' pictures were taken while wrapped in the Israeli flag, as a way of humiliating and possibly blackmailing them. You just have to scratch your head and wonder if the Bush administration is determined gradually to give supporting evidence for every single one of the anti-American stereotypes current in the Muslim world." (Juan Cole ‘Press Roundup for Wednesday 12/22’ http://www.juancole.com/ December 22nd 2004).
Israelis in the Bush administration who gave permission for the use of these torture tactics.
According to seymour hersh, "The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie not in the criminal inclinations of a few Army reservists but in a decision, approved last year by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to expand a highly secret operation, which had been focussed on the hunt for Al Qaeda, to the interrogation of prisoners in Iraq. Rumsfeld’s decision embittered the American intelligence community, damaged the effectiveness of élite combat units, and hurt America’s prospects in the war on terror. According to interviews with several past and present American intelligence officials, the Pentagon’s operation, known inside the intelligence community by several code words, including Copper Green, encouraged physical coercion and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners in an effort to generate more intelligence about the growing insurgency in Iraq. A senior C.I.A. official, in confirming the details of this account last week, said that the operation stemmed from Rumsfeld’s long-standing desire to wrest control of America’s clandestine and paramilitary operations from the C.I.A. Rumsfeld … authorized the establishment of a highly secret program that was given blanket advance approval to kill or capture and, if possible, interrogate "high value" targets in the Bush Administration’s war on terror. A special-access program, or sap—subject to the Defense Department’s most stringent level of security - was set up, with an office in a secure area of the Pentagon. The program would recruit operatives and acquire the necessary equipment, including aircraft, and would keep its activities under wraps." (Seymour M Hersh ‘The Gray Zone’ The New Yorker 15.05.2004 (DMY) http://newyorker.com/fact/content/?040524fa_fact).
Americans and Zionists dismiss the Geneva Convention.
"Taguba’s report, however, amounts to an unsparing study of collective wrongdoing and the failure of Army leadership at the highest levels. The picture he draws of Abu Ghraib is one in which Army regulations and the Geneva conventions were routinely violated, and in which much of the day-to-day management of the prisoners was abdicated to Army military-intelligence units and civilian contract employees. Interrogating prisoners and getting intelligence, including by intimidation and torture, was the priority." (Seymour M Hersh ‘Torture at Abu Ghraib The New Yorker 1.05.2004 (DMY) http://newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact).
"The United States has now matched Israel in its contempt for international law as the US has now declared to the world that it will no longer abide by the ABM treaty, nor by the Comprehensive Test Ban, put into place under Clinton, nor by the Chemical Weapons Treaty. It has rejected the Kyoto Accords, and also the Protocol to the Biological Weapons Conventions which was written to strengthen compliance with that treaty. And it has said that it will not honor the procedures of the recently formed International Criminal Court. The US repeatedly threatened the UN with irrelevancy in its run-up to the Iraq invasion. The administration has promulgated the new strategic doctrine that the United States will arrogate the right to pre-emptively attack any state which, in its view, might threaten its security at some indeterminate time in the indefinite future, which also happens to be a long standing Israeli military doctrine. That's what the Iraq war is about. This arrogant principle is a challenge to the very foundation of the United Nations and its prohibition against the non defensive use of force. The Bush administration and a strong viable and effective regime of international law cannot co-exist." (William James Martin ‘The Dogma of Richard Perle Zionism and Legal Skepticism’ Counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/martin07012004.html July 1, 2004).
Americans adopt Israeli Constitution for Iraq.
The israelis in the bush administration employed zionists in order to help iraqis draw up a provisional constitution for their country.
The electoral system used to elect a constitutional assembly in iraq was based upon that of the zionist state in palestine, "The success or failure of the political process in Iraq anyway has nothing to do with yearning for democracy. It has to do with the frankly stupid policies implemented by the Bush administration in Iraq. If the whole enterprise goes bad, it won't be because the Iraqis couldn't live up to Mr. Langley's ideals. It will be because the Americans, especially the Neoconservatives, crafted a ridiculous electoral system based on that of Israel." (Juan Cole ‘Elections in Iraq will be Held on Schedule, But with What Result?’ http://www.juancole.com/ November 28, 2004).
Zionists Sabotage America’s Post Invasion Planning.
In the early days after the invasion, commentators frequently pointed out that the americans did not seem to have any planning for the post-war political and industrial reconstruction of the country – even though bush proclaimed the invasion was to bring freedom and democracy to the iraqi people. As it turns out, the american state department had done the necessary planning – it was just ignored by the zionists in the bush administration because they do not want iraq to become industrially advanced and prosperous which would enable the country to rebuild its armed forces. These zionists prefer iraq to remain in a state of chaos and disorder than to become a stable, orderly, and civilized country that might one day turn against the zionist state. At the end of the day, they prefer iraqis to fight each other rather than fight the zionist state.
Jim lobe has pointed out that it was zionists in the bush administration who sabotaged post war development in iraq. "It was his (douglas feith) office that created shortly after 9/11 the Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group and the Office of Special Plans (OSP), which re-assessed 12 years of raw intelligence and the Arab press to find evidence of ties between the regime of former Iraq President Saddam Hussein and the al-Qaeda terrorist group. The OSP then ''stovepiped'' that information, unvetted by professional intelligence analysts, straight to Vice President Dick Cheney's office for use by the White House. Similarly, it was Feith's office, along with the Defense Policy Group (DPG), whose members Feith appointed, that served as the point of entry and influence for Iraqi National Congress (INC) chief Ahmed Chalabi and his ''defectors'' who provided phony intelligence about Hussein's vast stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). It was Feith's office that was charged with planning the post-war occupation and reconstruction process, and, in so doing, effectively excluded input from Iraqi experts from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and even from the Iraqi-American community, who had participated in a mammoth project that anticipated most of the problems occupation authorities have since encountered." (Jim Lobe ‘Soon to Be Losing Feith?’ antiwar.com http://www.antiwar.com/lobe/?articleid=2614 20.05.2004).
This view is supported by jon basil utley, "I should note that Feith, in his key policy planning position over the Pentagon, is also widely reported as the author of the plan to dismiss all the Iraqi soldiers and government officials, which has contributed so much to the chaos in Iraq. The book also says he blocked the State Department's planning for a civil administration to be ready right after the war. Correspondent Jim Lobe notes that Feith's former law partner is an attorney for Likud settlers on the West Bank. Many experts think that he promotes Sharon's wants, namely that Iraq be debilitated by chaos as a way of keeping it weak." (Jon Basil Utley ‘The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order’ Antiwar.com http://www.antiwar.com/utley/?articleid=2951 July 8, 2004). Justin raimondo has joined the chorus, "Feith headed up the "Office of Special Plans," the lie factory that churned out "intelligence" cooked to neocon specifications. Feith's office was also put in charge of post-war planning, and it was he who rejected carefully prepared studies made by the CIA and the State Department, whose analysts foresaw many of the problems and pitfalls that are killing American soldiers in increasing numbers." (Justin Raimondo ‘The Neoconning of America: Neoconservatives under fire – and it's David Brooks to the barricades!’ http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j010704.html January 7, 2004).
Jim lobe has also argued that, "The OSP also excluded many top Mideast experts from the State Department from playing any role in the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in Iraq." (Jim Lobe ‘Feith is the Answer’ Inter Press News Service Agency http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=20952 Nov 5 2003).
Zionists’ Disband the Iraqi Military.
After the invasion of iraq, the most critical decision feith made was disbanding the iraqi military and police - a decision carried out by the coalition provisional authority. This was almost the cpa’s first act and was one which, more than any other, shaped the course of events to the present time. It was one thing to try and carry out the debaathification of the iraqi military and police – it was quite another matter to disband the military and police in their entirety. This decision gave an enormous boost to the iraqi insurgency movement. Firstly, because many of the iraqis with military/police training were then free to use their skills to liberate their country from the zionist- american occupiers. And, secondly, the message that this sent out to every iraqi was that the zionists in the american administration were intent on keeping iraq defenceless against any military threat from its neighbours or the zionist state – something which many iraqis found repellant and humiliating and drove them into active or at the very least passive support for the nationalist cause.
The disbanding of the iraqi military was clearly a political decision to appease the zionist state in palestine. It was a decision made by zionists in the american administration to benefit the zionist state. It was a strikingly inept decision militarily because it led to a huge popular rebellion against the american occupation of iraq. However, it is a good example of the fatal consequences for americans of zionist domination over the american government. In effect, zionists in the american government implemented a policy which was politically advantageous to the zionist state whilst militarily endangering the lives of american troops. According to juan cole, "It was these Washington Institute for Near East Policy and AIPAC-linked US Likud backers in the Defense Department who had the Iraqi army dissolved as soon as Saddam was overthrown. This step threw Iraq into chaos and led to the deaths of nearly a thousand US servicemen so far, since an Iraq without an army would inevitably depend on the US military." (Juan Cole ‘Israeli Spy in Pentagon Linked to AIPAC’ http://www.juancole.com/ August 28, 2004). There could be little more clear cut line of responsibility - zionists are responsible for killing americans. (Cole has pointed out that in the 1980s, AIPAC set up the Washington Institute for Near East Policy as a pro-Israeli alternative to the Brookings Institution, which it perceived to be insufficiently supportive of Israel).
The Zionist Cult - Seymour Hersch
Seymour hersh makes some interesting points about the zionist cult dominating the bush administration. See Seymour Hersh ‘We've Been Taken Over By a Cult’ (http://www.counterpunch.org/hersh01272005.html January 27, 2005).
He states, "One of the ways - one of the things that you could say is, the amazing thing is we are been taken over basically by a cult, eight or nine neo-conservatives have somehow grabbed the government. Just how and why and how they did it so efficiently, will have to wait for much later historians and better documentation than we have now, but they managed to overcome the bureaucracy and the Congress, and the press, with the greatest of ease. It does say something about how fragile our Democracy is. You do have to wonder what a Democracy is when it comes down to a few men in the Pentagon and a few men in the White House having their way. What they have done is neutralize the C.I.A. because there were people there inside - the real goal of what Goss has done was not attack the operational people, but the intelligence people. There were people - serious senior analysts who disagree with the White House, with Cheney, basically, that's what I mean by White House, and Rumsfeld on a lot of issues, as somebody said, the goal in the last month has been to separate the apostates from the true believers. That's what's happening. The real target has been "diminish the agency." I'm writing about all of this soon, so I don't want to overdo it, but there's been a tremendous sea change in the government. A concentration of power."
He continues, "On the macro, we're hopeless. We're nowhere. The press is nowhere. The congress is nowhere. The military is nowhere. Every four-star General I know is saying, "Who is going to tell them we have no clothes?" Nobody is going to do it. Everybody is afraid to tell Rumsfeld anything. That's just the way it is. It's a system built on fear. It's not lack of integrity, it's more profound than that. Because there is individual integrity. It's a system that's completely been taken over - by cultists.
When are americans/christians//lefties/progressives going to break their slavish support for zionist world domination?
Adam Curtis, the Neocons, and The Power of Nightmares.
By far and away the best documentary on british terrestrial television about the so-called war on terror is Adam Curtis’s three part series ‘The Power of Nightmares’. Curtis’s thesis is that the two groups responsible for the war on terror are mirror images of each other - the american neoconservatives and the radical islamists. Both were triggered by political theorists who, in the 1950s, disdained american liberal democracy. Since then both movements have been trying to increase their political power by conjuring up dire political nightmares to frighten people into supporting them.
This article does not present a critique of curtis’s work: suffice it to say that although curtis is virtually the only documentary maker who talks about the american neocons, his series is marred by two striking deficiencies: firstly, the failure to mention that most of the american neocons are israelis and, secondly, his sidelining of the palestinian-zionist conflict. He focuses almost solely on the neocons’ domestic policies when it is precisely their foreign policies which distinguishes them from all other types of american conservatives.
The major achievement of curtis’s work is his analysis of the emergence of the neocons in the early 1970s. He reinterprets the past in a way that many compassionate people would find shocking. For those of a compassionate nature who lived through the vietnam war and its aftermath it is shocking to discover that the people we used to condemn turn out to be relatively benign in comparison to the evil spirits lurking in their shadows. How many of us used to condemn henry kissinger and the cia as being forces of evil in the world? How many of us realized at the time that both kissinger and the cia were acting, at least as far as the soviet union was concerned, pragmatically and were willing to compromise in order to maintain a stable world order? How many of us realized at the time that there were people who regarded both kissinger and the cia as being too soft on what they deemed to be the forces of evil in the world? How many of us realized that these people became powerful enough to eventually defeat both kissinger and the cia? How many of us realized that these people were the neocons – the same israeli traitors who drove america into the invasion of iraq and are currently driving the new bush administration towards armageddon?
The great shock of curtis's series is the discovery that the neocons didn’t just appear out of nowhere during the bush administration to push america into the needless invasion of iraq. Most other commentators on the neocons trace their roots back only to their 1996 israeli foreign policy document for benjamin netanyahu. In fact they had been formulating reactionary american foreign policies since the mid 1970s. What curtis makes obvious, without actually stating the idea, is that gerald ford’s neocon propaganda about the soviet union in the mid 1970s, and ronald reagan’s neocon inspired attacks on russia in the 1980s, were almost full dress rehearsals for bush’s neocon inspired attacks on saddam in the 2000s. The machiavellian tactics the neoconservatives’ used to force reagan into attacking russia were almost exactly the same tactics they used two decades later to push bush into attacking iraq. The same lies; the same nightmarish fantasies, the same empty fears, the same political battles with the cia, the reality based community. These revelations make curtis’s work far more politically relevant than the political sideshow produced by that shabbat goy, michael moore.
If you know little about the neocons’ history the following transcript of the first episode of ‘The Power of Nightmares’ should prove a revelation.
"In the early seventies, irving kristol became the focus of a group of disaffected intellectuals in washington. They were determined to understand why the optimistic liberal policies had failed. They found the answer in the theories of leo strauss. As the movement grew, many young students who had studied strauss’s ideas came to washington to join this group. This group became known as the neo-conservatives."
(The group included paul wolfowitz and william kristol. Most members of this group were israelis - all of whom were absolutely committed to the survival of the zionist state. Curtis focuses solely on their analysis of american society but it is utterly inconceivable that they would formulate policies than were irrelevant to the zionist state in palestine. On the contrary, they perceived the foreign policies of the zionist state and then sought to use america to promote these policies – in other to make america’s foreign policies compatible with those of the zionist state. This is crystal clear as regards russia. During the 1970s russia’s economy and military were in an advanced stage of decrepitude. As one commentator, jonathon steele described the soviet union, it was basically a third world country with superpower nuclear weapons. Russia did not pose any military threat to america – except under those circumstances where it was prepared to accept its own total annihilation – and whatever the russians were they weren’t genocidal. However, russia did pose a terrible threat to the zionist state. Russia could obliterate the zionist state in a matter of minutes. The zionist neocons knew all too well that the zionist state would never be safe militarily until the soviet union and even russia itself had been dismantled along with its nuclear threat. The only way the jewish neocons could help to protect the zionist state was by formulating american foreign policies to bring about the disintegration of the soviet union).
"The neoconservatives were idealists. Their aim was to try and stop the social disintegration they believed liberal freedoms had unleashed. They wanted to find a way of uniting the people and giving them a shared purpose. One of their great influences in doing this would be the theories of leo strauss. They would set out to recreate the myth of america as a unique nation whose destiny was to battle against evil in the world. In this the source of evil would be america’s cold war enemy, the soviet union. And by doing this they believed that they would not only give new meaning and purpose to people’s lives but they would spread the good of democracy around the world." (Once again curtis focuses on the neocons domestic policies. In reality, the neocons had to transform america’s foreign policies so that it would defend the zionist state by attacking the zionist state’s main enemies i.e. russia and the arab/moslem world. The concept of america’s unique destiny is simple a zionist code for persuading americans to lay down their lives, their resources, and their future, for the good of the zionist state in palestine).
(Once again, ignore curtis’s bizarre preoccupation with the neocons domestic policies. In june 1972 richard nixon, with the aid of henry kissinger, concluded a peace treaty with russia over nuclear weapons that ushered in a period of détente between the two countries that should have brought about the end of the cold war. Nixon proclaimed he had helped to create a world with less fear). "But a world without fear was not what the neoconservatives needed to pursue their project. They now set out to destroy henry kissinger’s vision. What gave them their opportunity was the growing collapse of american political power both abroad and at home. The defeat in vietnam and the resignation of nixon over watergate led to a crisis of confidence in america’s political class. The neoconservatives seized their moment. They allied themselves with two right wingers in the new administration of gerald ford. One was donald rumsveld, the new secretary of defence. The other was dick cheney, the president’s chief of staff. Rumsveld began to make speeches alleging that the soviets were ignoring kissinger’s treaties and secretly building up their weapons with the intention of attacking america."
(Rumsveld’s speeches consisted of a string of lies about russia’s non-existent build up of non-existent super weapons which is remarkably similar to his speeches nearly three decades later about saddam’s non-existent build up of non-existent super weapons. In both cases rumsveld was lying through his socks. It is important to appreciate that rumsveld was either paranoid or working for the american military industrial complex whereas the israeli neocons nightmares were real in the sense that russia was an annhilatory threat to the zionist state. Such allegations about russia’s increasing military power were mere political fictions to americans who didn’t care what happened to the zionist state. The only people for whom these nightmares were real were israelis who believed it was vital to protect the zionist state. The zionist neocons prove they are israeli traitors by expressing their terrifying fear of russia because americans shouldn’t experience such fears because russia is no threat to america).
"The CIA and other agencies who watched the soviet union continuously for any sign of threat said that this was a complete fiction. There was no truth in rumsveld’s allegations."
(This was the cia’s first battle with the zionist neocons over their fears for the zionist state in palestine. These battles were to persist for the next thirty years. It is no wonder that having decided, at the start of his second term of office, to pursue the neocons foreign policies, it then became necessary to neuter the cia by shifting many of its functions to the pentagon which was dominated by neocons).
"But rumsveld used his position to persuade president ford to set up an independent enquiry. He said it would prove that there was a hidden threat to america and the enquiry would be run by a group of neoconservatives one of whom was paul wolfowitz. The aim was to change the way that america saw the soviet union."
"The neoconservatives chose as the enquiry chairman a well known critic and historian of the soviet union called richard pipes. Pipes was convinced that whatever the soviets said publicly, secretly they still intended to attack and conquer america. This was their hidden mindset. The enquiry was called Team B and the other leading member was paul wolfowitz."
(In other words, rumsveld persuaded gerald ford to set up an independent enquiry to look into the soviet threat to america and then chose two israelis, richard pipes and paul wolfowitz, suffering from political nightmares about russia’s threat to the zionist state in palestine, to examine the evidence!).
"Team B began examining all the cia data on the soviet union but however closely they looked there was little evidence of the dangerous weapons or defence systems they claimed the soviets were developing. Rather than accept that this meant that the systems did not exist Team B made an assumption that the soviets had developed systems that were so sophisticated they were undetectable. For example, they could find no evidence that the soviet submarine fleet had an acoustic defence system. But what this meant, Team B said, was that the soviets had actually invented a new non-acoustic system which was impossible to detect. This meant that the whole of the american submarine fleet was at risk from an invisible threat that was there even though there was no evidence for it."
(These are, of course, exactly the same tactics that the neocons would use nearly three decades later to fabricate the rationale for america to invade iraq. To an outsider, it might seem a little odd that richard pipes and paul wolfowitz always suspected the existence of non-existent weapons but never seemed to notice the real weapons of mass destruction owned by the zionist state in palestine. In reality, however, neither of these israeli traitors would have been able to motivate america to fight for the zionist state without such lies. The so-called noble lie that leo strauss promoted was not the platonic lie necessary to keep peace and stability within a particular society, but the motivation for one country to unknowingly sacrifice itself for the sake of another country).
"What Team B accused the CIA of missing was a hidden and sinister reality in the soviet union. Not only were there many secret weapons the CIA hadn’t found but they were wrong about many of those they could observe such as the soviet air defences. The CIA were convinced that these were in a state of collapse reflecting the growing economic chaos in the soviet union. Team B said that this was actually a cunning deception by the soviet regime. The air defence system worked perfectly but the only evidence they produced to prove this was the official soviet training manual which proudly asserted that their air defence system was fully integrated and functioned flawlessly. The CIA accused Team B of moving into a fantasy world."
(The zionist neocons had no other option than churning out such blatant lies if they wanted to curb russia’s threat to the zionist state in palestine. This was the only way they could deceive the american president and the american people into taking action against the russians).
"The neoconservatives set up a lobby group to publicize the findings of Team B. It was called ‘the committee on the present danger’ and a growing number of politicians joined including a presidential hopeful called ronald reagan. Through films and television the committee portrayed a world in which america was under threat from hidden forces that could strike at any time. Forces that america must conquer to survive."
(The zionist neocons then relied on zionist financiers to fund these anti-american zionist publicity stunts and the zionist owned media to publicize them – all of which they did gleefully because they too realized this was their way of contributing to the long term survival of the zionist state. And to zionists, the long term survival of the zionist state is their primary objective).
"This dramatic battle between good and evil was precisely the kind of myth that leo strauss had taught his students would be necessary to rescue the country from moral decay. It might not be true but it was necessary to re-engage the public in a grand vision of america’s destiny that would give meaning and purpose to their lives. The neoconservatives were succeeding in creating a simplistic fiction. A vision of the soviet union as the centre of all evil in the world and america as the only country that could rescue them. And this nightmarish vision was beginning to give the neoconservatives great power and influence." (To zionists around the world and to the zionist state, the soviet union was the centre of all evil because it could obliterate the country in one fell swoop. However, the more that the zionists could zionize the american people i.e. the more that zionists were able to indoctrinate americans into adopting a zionist perspective, the more likely it was that they too would see it as the centre of evil).
"And at this very same moment (late seventies-early eighties) religion was being mobilized politically in america but for a very different purpose and those encouraging this were the neoconservatives. Many neoconservatives had become advisors to the presidential campaign of ronald reagan and as they became more involved with the republican party they had forged an alliance with the religious wing of the party because it shared their aim of the moral regeneration of america. By the late seventies there were millions of fundamentalist christians in america but their preachers had always told them not to vote. It would mean compromising with a doomed and immoral society. But the neoconservatives and their new republican allies made an alliance with a number of powerful preachers who told their followers to become involved in politics for the first time."
(The zionist neocons realized they needed to win mass support for the republican party if a republican president was to be elected who would then implement foreign policies to protect and defend the zionist state in palestine. They also realized that the more they could drum up support for the zionist state amongst republicans and christians, the more support there would be for such foreign policies. The neoconservatives’ alliance with what at the time was known as the moral majority was undoubtedly one of their most astute political tactics and one of their greatest political successes. It was one of the main pillars of their later political successes. Without such support, it might still have been possible for the neocons to transform america’s foreign policies but it would have been much more difficult electing republican presidents to implement such policies. The zionists’ conversion of fundamentalist christians, who believed in the god of love, to dechristianized zionists who believed in the zionist god of wrath is surely one of the most bizarre mass conversions in history. It is almost on a par with what happened in russia a decade and a half later, when the zionist oligarchs controlling the country used the zionist owned media to persuade russians to vote for a vodka soaked corpse. The day after his election, boris yeltsin suffered a heart attack and never took any further part in politics).
"And at the beginning of 1981 ronald reagan took power in america. The religious vote was crucial in his election because many millions of fundamentalists voted for the first time. And as they had hoped, many neoconservatives were given power in the new administration. Paul wolfowitz became head of the state department policy staff. While his close friend, richard perle, became the assistant secretary of defence. The head of Team B, richard pipes, became one of reagan’s chief advisers. The neoconservatives believed that they now had the chance to implement their vision of america’s revolutionary destiny. To use the country’s power aggressively as a force for good in the world in an epic battle to defeat the soviet union. It was a vision that they shared with millions of their new religious allies."
(In reality, america’s unique vision is basically to demilitarize all possible threats to the long term survival of the zionist state in palestine no matter how much this might generate anti-american hatred around the world).
"To persuade the president, the neoconservatives set out to prove that the soviet threat was far greater than anyone, even Team B, had previously shown. They would demonstrate that the majority of terrorism and revolutionary movements around the world were actually part of a secret network co-ordinated by moscow to take over the world."
(This is presumably the same non-existent network of global terrorists that saddam took over after the collapse of the soviet union. In reality the only global network of terrorists were the zionists manipulating americans into believing that russia was a military threat to america).
"The main proponent of this theory was a leading neoconservative who was the special adviser to the secretary of state. His name was michael ledeen and he had been influenced by a best selling book called ‘The Terror Network’. It alleged that terrorism was not the fragmented phenomenon that it appeared to be. In reality all terrorist groups from the plo to the bader-meinhof group in germany and the provisional ira, all of them were part of a coordinated strategy of terror run by the soviet union. But the CIA completely disagreed. They said this was just another neoconservative fantasy."
(One has to commiserate with the cia, the reality-based community, that it had to put up with these israeli traitors who were prepared to do anything, whether it meant lying, cheating, or stealing, for the noble purpose of protecting the zionist state in palestine and the not so noble purpose of using americans as their sacrificial lambs).
"But the neconservatives had a powerful ally. He was william casey and he was the new head of the cia. Casey was sympathetic to the neoconservative view and when he read the terror network book he was convinced. He called a meeting of the cia’s soviet analysts at their headquarters and told them to produce a report for the president that proved this hidden network existed. But the analysts told him this would be impossible because much of the information in the book came from black propaganda the cia themselves had invented to smear the soviet union. They knew that the terror network didn’t exist because they themselves had made it up."
(It didn’t matter at all to these israeli traitors how many of their lies were exposed as long as they could provide a steady torrent of lies which would be eagerly publicized by the zionist owned media. By the time that one lie had been exposed and the truth disseminated throughout society, two or three other lies had taken its place to maintain people’s support for these zionist policies).
"In the end, Casey found a university professor who described himself as a terror expert and he produced a dossier that confirmed that the hidden terror network did in fact exist. Under such intense lobbying, reagan agreed to give the neoconservatives what they wanted and in 1983 he signed a secret document that fundamentally changed american foreign policy. The country would now fight covert wars to push back the hidden soviet threat around the world. It was a triumph for the neoconservatives. America was now setting out to do battle against the forces of evil in the world. But what had started out as the kind of myth that leo strauss had said was necessary for the american people, increasingly came to be seen as the truth by the neoconservatives. They began to believe their own fiction. They had become what they called democratic revolutionaries who were going to use force to change the world."
(The neocons are not ‘democratic revolutionaries’. If they were concerned about democracy they would support palestinian rights in palestine. They are israeli traitors manipulating america into wars that are of no benefit to america but of critical importance to the survival of the zionist state in palestine).
The rest as they say is history.
Researchers on ‘The Power of Nightmares’ were satiyesh manoharajah and hossam al-hamalawy
The Rise of Zionist World Domination.
This blog explores the emergence of zionist world domination.
Zionist influence over the american and british media has grown almost exponentially since the end of the second world war until zionists now own and control virtually all the major newspapers, radio, and television companies in these countries. In america, the key which enabled zionists to buy up newspapers, commercial radio, and television companies, was advertising revenue from zionist owned industries. Many newspapers were driven into bankruptcy because zionist advertisers wanted to advertise only in newspapers which promoted zionist policies. "Jewish advertising power not only has increased the Jewish monopolization and consolidation of American newspapers, it also greatly affects publications with Gentile management or ownership. All major publications are dependent on Jewish advertising revenue, so their features, reporting, and editorial policies must be carefully attuned to Jewish attitudes and interests. Ultimately, the free press is not free. It runs on money. The old axiom certainly holds true in the media: "He who pays the piper calls the tune." (David Duke ‘Who Runs the Media?’ http://www.davidduke.com/awakening/chapter19_05.html). A more recent example of this phenomenon happened in britain when zionists punished the spectator magazine for publishing what they claimed was an anti-semitic article. "Following Mr. Weinraub's article, the Anti-Defamation League swung into action from its New York office as a result of this one of our valued advertisers canceled its contract with us and the Los Angeles Times ran a leader page article to denounce young William Cash." (Dominic Lawson ‘Taboo or not Taboo, That is the Question’ The Spectator, Nov. 19, 1994 Quoted in Jews to Islam ‘Hollywood Jews’ http://www.jewstoislam.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1042&sid=d1fd6aa9baddc0437aae4b9282e8bf4c c.2004). Zionist dominance of the american (and brutish) political systems followed in the wake of zionists’ control of the media.
After the foundation of the zionist state, zionists used their financial and economic power to finance its survival. As zionists’ control over the american/brutish media began to increase, they were able to win the support of politicians and the public in both countries for the zionist state and its expansionist policies. The greater zionists’ control over the american/brutish media, the greater their control over the american/brutish public, and the greater their control over the american/brutish political systems. The israeli owned media was able to transform the repugnance of the american and british public for the zionist state’s racist policies into public/political approval. Over the decades, despite the increasing belligerence of the zionist state in palestine, the zionist owned media in america was able to increase the zionist state’s popularity amongst america’s politicians and the public. It is revealing that during the 1970s and the 1980s whilst enormous efforts were made to expose, boycott, and eventually dismantle, the apartheid system in south africa, virtually nothing similar was done about the apartheid zionist state in palestine - even though the zionist state has always been far more racist and barbaric than south african apartheid.
From the 1960s onwards increasing numbers of israelis began to infiltrate into american politics. Many more set up or joined israeli think tanks in america to develop policies favourable to the zionist state in palestine. They then lobbied for such policies amongst american politicians – often with the backing of the zionist owned american media – and gradually learnt enough about the american political system to enable them to become a part of the political process. In case it might be thought that this might not be a very substantial route into american politics it should be pointed out that there is a .. "vast community of 52 American Jewish organizations totally devoted to control American Middle East policies for the benefit of Israel." (Youssef M. Ibrahim ‘Outside View: Israeli hubris vs. the U.S’ http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20041221-074429-8040r.htm December 21st 2004).
Many jews started out on the left of american politics, some even on the extreme left, but gradually became disenchanted with the democratic party and shifted to the republicans. "The original neocons were a small group of mostly Jewish liberal intellectuals who, in the 1960s and 70s, grew disenchanted with what they saw as the American left's social excesses and reluctance to spend adequately on defense. Many of these neocons worked in the 1970s for Democratic Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a staunch anti-communist. By the 1980s, most neocons had become Republicans, finding in President Ronald Reagan an avenue for their aggressive approach of confronting the Soviet Union with bold rhetoric and steep hikes in military spending. (No author ‘Neocon 101’ Christian Science Monitor http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/neocon101.html no date c.2003).
The jewish neocons were at the forefront of the reagan administration’s efforts to topple the soviet empire. "Where other conservatives favored détente and containment of the Soviet Union, neocons pushed direct confrontation, which became their raison d'etre during the 1970s and 80s." (No author ‘Neocon 101’ Christian Science Monitor http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/neocon101.html no date c.2003). They persuaded the reagan administration to provide support for islamic extremists in afghanistan to push the soviet empire out of afghanistan. Whilst the common phrase for the superpower rivalry between the soviet empire and america was the ‘cold war’, the israeli neocons called it the third world war. This phrase is a part of their basic vocabulary and the basis of their understanding of their rise to power in global politics. Conversely, it can be used to identify israeli neocon supporters.
The ostensible objective of the israeli neocons’ efforts to bring down the soviet union was to boost the global power of the united states. However, there was another objective which, given the neocons’ loyalties to the zionist state in palestine, may have been an even more important than the first. The israeli neocons believed the soviet union was anti-semitic and gave support to countries around the world which were also anti-semitic. The dismantling of the soviet union would thus go a long way to combating global anti-semitism. In addition, the dismantling of the soviet union would also free millions of russian jews to leave the country and emigrate to the zionist state in palestine. "By the 1970s, the neocons were taking an aggressive stance against the Soviet Union, which they saw as a bastion of anti-Semitism and opposition to Israel. Richard Perle was the prime organizer of Congressional support for the 1974 Jackson-Vanik Amendment which angered the Soviet Union by linking bilateral trade issues to freedom of emigration, primarily of Jews from the Soviet Union to Israel and the United States." (Kevin MacDonald ‘Thinking About Neoconservatism’ http://VDare.com/ September 18, 2003).
The israeli neocons not only used the reagan administration to try and topple the soviet union they also used a range of zionist think tanks to produce a constant stream of publicity about the need to give russians the right to emigrate. These think tanks rarely referred explicitly to the rights of jews but predominantly, in order to win wider popular support, to the general concept of human rights. The irony of the neocons’ position, and what exposed their facile belief in human rights, was that after the soviet union had been forced to allow russian jews to emigrate most of them did so to the united states. As a consequence, the israeli neocons in the united states introduced a law limiting the numbers of russian jews who would be allowed to settle in the country – thereby forcing hundreds of thousands to emigrate to the zionist state in palestine – where they helped the zionist state to annexe even more palestinian land. If it hadn’t been for this massive influx of russian jews, over a million altogether, it would never have been possible for the zionist state to have carried out such a wide-scale annexation of palestinian land. The neocons’ defeat of the soviet empire was their first great victory and gave their rise to world domination a huge political boost.
It has to be emphasized that although zionists in the reagan administrations were very influential and played a leading role in promoting the afghanistan war, and the cold war against the soviet union, they did not have a dominant degree of political power in america. In 1979, ayatollah khoemeini led an islamic revolution which overthrew the shah of iran who had been armed and financed by the united states for the previous couple of decades. During the revolution, islamic revolutionaries captured the american embassy and kept its officials as political hostages for a year – in fact, until the day of reagan’s inauguration as president of the united states. America’s priority was to exact revenge on iran and contain iran’s revolutionary zeal from toppling a range of dictatorial regimes in the middle east. The reagan administrations financed and armed iraq to wage war on iran: in effect using saddam to fight a proxy american war against iran. Reagan’s arming of iraq was bitterly opposed by zionists who feared that after the war, saddam would use his new found military power to challenge the zionist state. But there was nothing they could do to stop american support for saddam. It was only after the israelis’ success in bringing about the collapse of the soviet empire that they achieved a much greater degree of dominance over the american government which enabled them to shift the american government’s foreign policies in the middle east from a reliance on arab/moslem leaders towards a greater reliance on the zionist state, "In the 1970s and 1980s, U.S. Middle Eastern policy, although sympathetic to Israel, was not identical to that of Israel."(Stephen J Sniegoski 'The war on Iraq: Conceived in Israel' www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_conc1.htm c.February 2003).
Zionists’ influence over american (and brutish) politics was considerable prior to the collapse of the soviet union but it increased substantially after the collapse at the end of the 1980s. This happened for two reasons. Firstly, the neocons had been at the forefront of the attack on the soviet union and were thus regarded as heroes for bringing about such dramatic and wide-ranging changes. Secondly, the neocons were able to exploit the fact that russia lost much of its political and military influence over large parts of the world. America quickly filled the political and military vacuum left by the russians and this gave it much greater influence over the middle east. The increase in american power over the middle east gave the zionists more opportunities to influence american policies over the middle east – after all, the israelis were supposed to be experts about the middle east. The 1991 gulf war would not have been possible if the soviet union had still been a superpower because it would have continued to protect iraq which was within its sphere of influence. The collapse of the soviet union thus had a profound effect not only on the global balance of power between america and russia but on zionists’ power over the american government. In effect, when america became the world’s sole superpower, zionists’ control over america’s media and political system gave them, ipso facto, world domination.
The first manifestation of zionists’ fledgling dominance over the american government was the 1991 gulf war. Many american politicians were indifferent to iraq’s proposed invasion of kuwait – after all, they knew that iraq had bankrupted itself on america’s behalf in the war against iran, and that saddam saw kuwait as america’s pay-off for the sacrifices his country had made over the previous decade. However, the israeli neocons and the zionists were horrified at the prospect of saddam acquiring kuwait’s oil wealth which he would have used to rebuild his country and his military power which would thus pose a threat to the zionists’ hegemony over the middle east. The zionist state in palestine threatened the united states that if it did not remove saddam from kuwait then it would attack saddam. The israeli neocons in america supported the demands of the zionist state which led patrick buchanan, virtually the only politician around the world who seemed to notice what was going on, to denounce the role of the israeli neocons.
The second manifestation of zionists’ dominance over the american government came just after the end of the war when the neocons forced the american and british governments to introduce, through united nations’ resolutions, a highly punitive set of sanctions to, in effect, demilitarize iraq.
The rise of zionist world domination did not proceed entirely smoothly. It was challenged directly by george bush snr. This met with disastrous results - he lost the next presidential election, "In 1991 George H.W. Bush, the father of the man who sits in the White House and the only member of his family ever to have been elected president, demanded that the Israelis stop building new settlements in Palestinian territory. Unlike previous presidents, Bush sounded serious, threatening to block billions in loan guarantees if Israel disobeyed. As might have been predicted, the dominant voices among American Jews were outraged, and Bush responded by complaining at a press conference that "Jews work insidiously behind the scenes." On another occasion he reminded critics that the U.S. gives "Israel the equivalent of $1,000 for every Israeli citizen," a remark that detractors took as antisemitic. Later on Bush's Secretary of State James Baker made his famous "fuck the Jews" remark in private conversation, noting that Jews "didn't vote for us anyway." And it was true: when he lost to Bill Clinton in 1992, Bush got smallest percentage of the Jewish vote of any Republican since 1964." (Noel Ignatiev ‘Toward a Single State Solution: Zionism, Anti-Semitism and the People of Palestine’ counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/ignatiev06172004.html 17.06.2004).
The event which led to the most dramatic consolidation of zionist world domination was the september 2001 pentagon and new york (hereinafter referred to as p*ny) bombings. George bush jnr’s initial response to this event was to declare war on al quaeda. By january 2002, however, the zionist owned media and zionist owned politicians had exploited this event to win popular and presidential approval for a war on all terror groups – even though they were not a threat to america only the zionist state. Despite the fact that the interests of the zionist state in palestine are quite distinct from the interests of the american state, american zionists were able to transform american foreign policies so that they promoted zionist, rather than american, interests. Zionists in the american media/politics deceived the american public into believing that america’s new zionist policies were in america’s best interests. America’s middle east policies were designed to boost the regional dominance of the zionist state in the middle east and these were the same policies being promoted by the zionist state. Zionists’ power in america enabled them to lead america (and brutland) into wars against afghanistan and iraq, and to declare the start of what was commonly called the third world war against islamic rebels - but which the zionists called world war four. That zionists have been able to drive the western world into a war against the moslem world simply in order to boost the dominance of the utterly racist zionist state in palestine and in the middle east is possible only because of zionists’ world domination.
The zionists who have taken over the bush administration are using the american military to create a new zionist world order. It is not surprising that these israelis are highly antagonistic to the united nations’ efforts to create a new world order through the family of nations. The neocons had gone along with the united nations when it suited them i.e. support for human (jews only) rights in the 1970s and 1980s and the sanctions imposed on iraq in the 1990s but as soon as this organization had outlived its purpose the israelis set about trying to destroy it. The arch neo-con zionist richard perle has made clear his contempt for the united nations. "Writing in the Guardian of London on March 21, 2003, under the title, "Thank God for the Death of the UN", just as the American invasion of Iraq was getting underway, Richard Perle, member of the Pentagon's Defense Advisory Board, said of Saddam Hussein: ... He will go quickly, but not alone: in a parting irony, he will take the UN down with him." This attitude is common amongst the israelis in the bush administration, "Such disdain for international law is very clearly expressed in considerable detail in a 1996 document prepared for the incoming Natanyahu government of Israel of that year entitled, A Clean Break: a New Strategy for Securing the Realm", prepared by Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David and Meyrav Wurmser, James Colbert, and Robert Loenberg in their capacity as members of The Institute for Advanced Strategy and Political Studies' "Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000" a Washington/Jerusalem based think tank providing policy analyses for the government of Israel." (William James Martin ‘The Dogma of Richard Perle: Zionism and Legal Skepticism’ Counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/martin07012004.html July 1, 2004).
Neocons’ disdain for the united nations stems unambiguously from the zionist state’s refusal to abide by united nations’ resolutions. "Israel has violated more that 60 UN Security Council resolutions and has never recognized the constraints of UNR 242 and 338 which requires the relinquishing of the parts of Palestine taken by force in the '67 War, much less UN Resolution 194 which call for the reparation of the indigenous Palestinian population expelled from Palestine in 1948." (William James Martin ‘The Dogma of Richard Perle Zionism and Legal Skepticism’ Counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/martin07012004.html July 1, 2004); "The United States has now matched Israel in its contempt for international law as the US has now declared to the world that it will no longer abide by the ABM treaty, nor by the Comprehensive Test Ban, put into place under Clinton, nor by the Chemical Weapons Treaty. It has rejected the Kyoto Accords, and also the Protocol to the Biological Weapons Conventions which was written to strengthen compliance with that treaty. And it has said that it will not honor the procedures of the recently formed International Criminal Court. The US repeatedly threatened the UN with irrelevancy in its run-up to the Iraq invasion. The administration has promulgated the new strategic doctrine that the United States will arrogate the right to pre-emptively attack any state which, in its view, might threaten its security at some indeterminate time in the indefinite future, which also happens to be a long standing Israeli military doctrine. That's what the Iraq war is about. This arrogant principle is a challenge to the very foundation of the United Nations and its prohibition against the non defensive use of force. The Bush administration and a strong viable and effective regime of international law cannot co-exist." (William James Martin ‘The Dogma of Richard Perle Zionism and Legal Skepticism’ Counterpunch http://www.counterpunch.org/martin07012004.html July 1, 2004). The choice is clear: either the united nations and the world community forces the zionist state to abide by united nations’ resolutions or it is replaced by zionist inspired american policies of pre-emptive, lawless, unilateralism aiming to create a new zionist world order.
To summarize: zionists became the dominant political force in american politics, especially congress, after the collapse of the soviet union. But, it was only after the p*ny bombings that the israelis occupied enough positions of power within the american presidency to control, for the first time, an american president. This enabled them to completely reshape american foreign policy to their own liking. This has given them what, in effect, is world domination. Since then, zionists have consolidated and reinforced their grip over the american media and political system to the point where ariel sharon could blurt out, "Every time we do something, you tell me americans will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear. Don’t worry about american pressure on israel; we, the jewish people, control america and the americans know it." (Zionist Prime Minister Ariel Sharon October 3, 2001 IAP News). And nobody in the american administration disagreed with his statement because they knew it to be true. (What is even more amazing, is that sharon could have said exactly the same about russia because, at that time, the country was being controlled by the zionist oligarchs - until putin put an end to their ill-gotten reign).
The israeli neocons in the bush administration set up their own state within the state in order to feed the president with lies about saddam which led him to promote the invasion of iraq. This israeli neocon state within the american state was called the office for special projects. Israeli generals were often seen waltzing into OSP offices in order to ensure the american military was implementing zionist policies, "Karen Kwiatkowski was an eyewitness in NESA (the Pentagon’s Near East and South Asia office), and Lobe reports: "she recounts one incident in which she helped escort a group of half a dozen Israelis, including several generals, from the first floor reception area to Feith's office. (Douglas J. Feith was undersecretary of defense for policy). "We just followed them, because they knew exactly where they were going and moving fast." When the group arrived, she noted the book which all visitors are required to sign under special regulations that took effect after the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks. "I asked his secretary, 'Do you want these guys to sign in?' She said, 'No, these guys don't have to sign in.'" It occurred to her, she said, that the office may have deliberately not wanted to maintain a record of the meeting.’" (Juan Cole ‘Israeli Spy in Pentagon Linked to AIPAC’ http://www.juancole.com/ August 28, 2004). Julian borger makes the same point, "The Office of Special Projects was an open and largely unfiltered conduit to the White House not only for the Iraqi opposition. It also forged close ties to a parallel, ad hoc intelligence operation inside Ariel Sharon's office in Israel specifically to bypass Mossad and provide the Bush administration with more alarmist reports on Saddam's Iraq than Mossad was prepared to authorise. "None of the Israelis who came were cleared into the Pentagon through normal channels," said one source familiar with the visits. Instead, they were waved in on Mr Feith's authority without having to fill in the usual forms." (Julian Borger ‘The spies who pushed for war’ Guardian July 17, 2003). Surely if the zionist state in palestine was only an american political satellite then it would not be surprising to hear of american generals walking into the offices of zionists’ defence department in such a way. But to discover this was what zionist generals were doing in america’s defence department suggests an entirely different relationship.
Zionists still do not have total domination over american politics. The zionist-controlled bush administration does not have the same control over the american people as the zionist state in palestine has over the palestinians. For the last few decades, zionists have been taking the leaders of america’s armed forces on all expenses paid trips to the zionist state in order to indoctrinate them into zionism. They have also been taking american politicians and religious leaders on such jaunts. These zionized religious leaders have converted tens of millions of christians into apocalyptic zionism which supports the forcible removal of all palestinians from their homeland. America’s zionist dominated media has persuaded a large section of the american public to support the zionist state because of the hoax they have perpetrated about the zionist state as a helpless victim facing the overwhelming power of the arab world. And zionists’ ownership of a major proportion of american industries ensures the silence of millions of non-zionist employees about the injustices being perpetrated by the zionist state in palestine. Perhaps, if american goyims began to rebel against their manipulation by their zionist rulers then the zionists would have to start treating them as they do palestinians. But, it seems that most americans are so ignorant of the world around them that zionists are unlikely to have to resort to such tactics in the near future.